Errata and addenda to the thesis
|
None of the following currently known local typos is influencing the results of the work! | ||||
Local incorrectnesses: | ||||
section | page(s) | place(s) | typo description | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 | 30 | last sentence in Current kernel | instead of "whereas the sign of these must be inverted" it must read: "whereas the diagrammatic rules already imply the sign inversion" | |
2.3 | 36 | in equation (36) | ||
2.3 | 37 | in table 2, entries | ||
2.3 | 40 | in equation (39) and the preceeeding expression | see p40.pdf: a definition ofnot consistent with Eq. (130) was used here | |
2.4 | 48-49 | in equations (43), (44), (45) | ||
2.4 | 49 | in the definition of the T-matrix | ||
2.3 | 51-52 | in all equations related to | see p52.pdf: the misdefinition of from p. 43 was used here consistently (i.e., the r.h.s of the final equations (47a)/(47b) are correct) | |
5.3 | 129 | in equation (103) and in the preceding expression | ||
A.2 | 142-143 | all occuring tunnelling matrix elements | ||
A.3 | 176 | equation (130), last distinction by case | ||
Typos not causing incorrectness: | ||||
section | page(s) | place(s) | typo description | |
2.3 | 45 | at the very beginning of line 14 | ||
2.4 | 51 | regularisation formula (second equation) | ||
5.3 | 129 | in the expression preceding equation (103) | ||
Addenda: | ||||
section | page(s) | place(s) | addendum | |
2.4/A.2 | 51/173 | principal part integrations with numerator 1, squares in denominator | usingprovides an elegant way to show that such integrals are zero | |
2.5 | 55 | reference to publication | Phys. Rev. B 82, 235307 (2010) | |
3.3 | 75 | title of publication | "Inelastic cotunneling in quantum dots and molecules with weakly broken degeneracies" | |
3.3 | 75 | reference to publication | Phys. Rev. B 82, 045316 (2010) | |
4.5 | 109 | reference to publication [118] | New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 033038 | |
5.4 | 75 | title of publication | "Sources of negative tunneling magnetoresistance in multilevel quantum dots with ferromagnetic contacts" | |
5.4 | 109 | reference to publication | Phys. Rev B 85 (2012) 045313 | |
A.2 | 143 | top of page, exemplary expression for fourth order | as for the second order example the exponential functions have already been cancelled against each other | |
A.2 | 142, 168/169 | Solution of the energy integration | there exists a way more elegant solution (thanks Sebastian!), which allows for a proper inclusion of the band edges: see residua.pdf | |
Created by: Sonja Koller; latest update: 16.04.2012; deutsche Version |