This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Close this notification
Paper The following article is OPEN ACCESS

Air tightness of hBN encapsulation and its impact on Raman spectroscopy of van der Waals materials

, , , , , , , , , and

Published 8 November 2019 © 2019 IOP Publishing Ltd
, ,

2053-1583/7/1/015012

Abstract

Raman spectroscopy is a precious tool for the characterization of van der Waals materials, e.g. for the determination of the layer number in thin exfoliated flakes. For sensitive materials, however, this method can be dramatically invasive. In particular, the light intensity required to obtain a significant Raman signal is sufficient to immediately photo-oxidize few-layer thick metallic van der Waals materials. In this work we investigated the impact of the environment on Raman characterization of thin NbSe2 crystals. We show that in ambient conditions the flake is locally oxidized even for very low illumination intensity. Based on this extreme sensitivity to the presence of light and oxygen, we could study the air-tightness of the hBN encapsulation method, the most common passivation method for a wide range of 2D material-based devices. We find that only fully encapsulated devices are reliably air-tight. On the contrary, a simple hBN cover from the top does not prevent a slow diffusion of oxygen between the SiO2 surface and the flake itself.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

cc-by

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

2D materials are by definition all-surface crystals, where the environment plays a crucial role compared to bulk systems [1]. Interaction with the substrate (typically a polished SiO2 wafer) and absorption of ambient contaminants unavoidably introduce a considerable amount of disorder [2, 3]. Further contamination is produced by standard exfoliation techniques based on viscoelastic polymers and by nano-lithographic patterning [4]. The impact of the environment is particularly critical for materials that tend to oxidize [3, 57]. In this case, a brief exposure to air might lead to the complete disappearance of the material under study, which is rapidly substituted by its oxide species.

In most cases, oxidation in van der Waals materials is highly stimulated by light [8]. This makes their optical characterization, e.g. by Raman spectroscopy, where relatively high illumination intensities and/or integration times are required, rather difficult. On the other hand, Raman spectroscopy is a fundamental tool for the study of few-layer van der Waals materials. It provides a handy, precise and usually nondestructive means of mapping individual crystals. A plethora of important information, such as the number of layers [9, 10], doping [1113] or applied strain [14, 15] can be extracted from Raman spectra for many different two-dimensional materials. While most Raman-active modes are specific to the crystal structure of a certain material, the rigid-layer shear and compression modes are generic to the layered van der Waals materials [1619]. Due to the weak interlayer coupling in these materials, however, they have low Raman shifts and are more challenging to observe than higher-frequency modes.

In the present work we investigate the role of the environment in Raman spectroscopy of few-layer NbSe2 crystals, an exemplary van der Waals material that is well known for its reactivity in air [7, 20, 21]. We show that in ambient conditions NbSe2 quickly oxidizes already under very low illumination intensity. Such large sensitivity to light and oxygen allows us to track the dynamics of the interfacial oxygen diffusion by studying the evolution of the Raman peaks. The main goal of our work is to evaluate the air-tightness of the most used protection method for van der Waals materials, namely, hBN encapsulation. We show that an encapsulation in hBN from both the bottom and the top side (here indicated as full encapsulation) is totally air-tight and very effective in preventing photo-oxidation on a long term. Instead, the commonly used half encapsulation method (where NbSe2 is covered by hBN only from the top side while adhering on the SiO2 substrate) is not sufficient to protect the sensitive crystal, since it allows for a slow diffusion of oxygen underneath the layers.

Few-layer NbSe2 crystals are exfoliated in a glove-box filled with nitrogen gas. Except for the glove-box, our stamping setup is nearly identical to that described in [4]. We use two methods for stamping 2D materials. The former method (hereafter indicated as simple stamping) is the same as the one described in [4]: 2D crystals are exfoliated with an adhesive tape and transferred onto a thin polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) film which adheres on a glass slide. Suitable flakes are found by inspection in an optical microscope and transferred onto a substrate using a micromanipulator placed under a zoom-lens. Our standard substrates consist of degenerately doped Si wafers capped with 285 nm-thick thermal SiO2. The latter stamping method (hereafter indicated as pick-up) is similar to that described in [22, 23]: 2D crystals are first placed on temporary substrates (e.g. by simple stamping) and then picked-up at 120 °C by a thick, round PDMS film covered by polycarbonate (PC). Several different crystals can be sequentially picked up. Finally, the stack is stamped at 180 °C onto the final substrate. At this temperature PC is dissolved and is released together with the stack onto the substrate surface. The PC residuals are finally dissolved in chloroform.

Raman spectroscopy measurements were performed in a self-built optical setup, experimental details are published elsewhere [19, 24]. Briefly, we utilize a continuous-wave laser source with wavelength 532 nm filtered with a narrow bandpass. This is coupled into a 100$\times$ , NA 0.8 microscope objective, resulting in a spot size of about 1 $\mu$ m. The sample, mounted inside a small He-flow cryostat serving as a vacuum chamber, is positioned under the fixed optical beam path with a motorized xy-stage. The backscattered Raman light is collected using the same objective, dispersed using a grating spectrometer equipped with a 1800 grooves per mm holographic grating and detected with a Peltier-cooled CCD camera. To ensure a wavenumber accuracy of 0.5 cm−1, the instrument was periodically calibrated using the 520.5 cm−1 band of the underlying Si substrate as a reference. While the higher-energy Raman modes of NbSe2 could be measured using a single long-pass-filter and parallel polarization geometry, we had to utilize a set of 3 Bragg filters in order to access the low-frequency shear modes. Additionally, crossed-polarization geometry was used to further suppress the elastically backscattered laser.

In our first reference experiment we investigated few-layer NbSe2 crystals transferred by simple exfoliation on a standard Si/SiO2 substrate one day before the measurement. The results of micro-Raman measurements in ambient conditions show a dramatic oxidation within a few seconds even under an illumination power of only 8 $\mu$ W. Figure 1(a) shows an optical picture of sample $\mathsf{A}$ , an exemplary bilayer NbSe2 flake partially covered by a hBN crystal. This sample has been obtained by the simple stamping procedure described above. Panel (b) shows the same sample after three brief (10 s integration each) attempts to measure the Raman spectrum in different positions, here labelled as A, B and C. The illumination power in this case is 8 $\mu$ W, which is much less than the threshold for obtaining a discernible signal in reasonable integration times. After illumination, the spot positions appear as holes, i.e. regions that look more transparent than the surroundings. These are clear signs of photo-induced oxidation. Remarkably, the hBN protection does not help to limit the oxidation process: the spot C, which is covered by hBN, looks similar to those in A and B. This is one of the most surprising results of our work. Figure 1(c) shows a topography map obtained by AFM on the same sample after the Raman measurement attempts. We notice that the oxidized regions are not visible on the unprotected part. This indicates that the oxidation does not significantly alter the thickness of the crystal (within the limit of vertical resolution of the AFM scan, which is about 0.5 nm). Interestingly, on the hBN-covered part, the oxidation spot appears instead as a bulge in the topography.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. (a) Optical microscope picture of a bilayer NbSe2 flake (sample $\mathsf{A}$ ) partially covered by a hBN flake. (b) Optical picture of the same flake after the attempt of measuring Raman spectra in three different positions, labelled as A, B and C in the figure. Owing to light-induced oxidation, these three spots appear as holes in the crystals. The incident light intensity equals 8 $\mu$ W distributed over a spot size of about 1 $\mu$ m. The positions A and B correspond to unprotected NbSe2 while the position C to a half encapsulated portion. (c) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) topography of the same flake after the measurements above. We notice that the oxidation does not produce an appreciable change in the apparent layer thickness for the spots A and B. The spot C in the encapsulated portion reveals instead a slight swell.

Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slide

The most straightforward way to circumvent the oxidation problem is to perform the Raman measurements in high vacuum. This is the method used in the literature of Raman experiments on few-layer NbSe2 crystals [25, 26]. Thus, before studying encapsulated samples, we have also performed Raman measurements in vacuum. Such measurements show that degradation is indeed due to photo-oxidation produced by ambient oxygen and not by the SiO2 substrate. Moreover, the resulting spectra serve as a reference for our measurements on hBN-encapsulated NbSe2: they allow us to verify both the sample quality and the measurement setup. As shown below, we can clearly observe even the relatively weak shear mode peaks. Their Raman shifts perfectly match what has been recently observed in the literature.

We performed measurements on crystals obtained again by simple exfoliation on a standard Si/SiO2 substrate one day before the measurement. This time, we loaded the samples in the vacuum chamber, which was pumped down to few 10−5 mbar. The measurements are carried out at room temperature. In such conditions, no oxidation is observed even for long exposures (of at least several tens of minutes) to 5 mW of illumination power, nearly three orders of magnitude more than the power used in the tests in air. The absence of oxidation allows us to use a suitable integration time so that we can also observe weak Raman features such as the interlayer $E^2_{2g}$ shear mode [27, 28]. Our goal is to obtain a layer number mapping of the sample, in order to associate a well defined layer number to a given optical contrast. To this end, we chose a flake with several terraces, each with a different color and contrast. Part of the flake is again covered by hBN. Figure 2(b) shows low-frequency Raman spectra measured on five distinct positions on sample $\mathsf{B}$ plus one spectrum measured on a monolayer portion located on another sample (sample $\mathsf{C}$ ). Figure 2(c) shows a plot of the Raman shift versus number of layers, together with a fit with the function

Equation (1)
Figure 2.

Figure 2. (a) Optical microscope picture of sample $\mathsf{B}$ . It consists of a NbSe2 flake with many terraces, whose bottom part is covered by a hBN flake. Raman spectra have been measured on the positions A–E indicated by the arrows. The number of layers is indicated in brackets. The smaller panel shows a picture of the region corresponding to the yellow frame captured before stamping hBN. (b) Raman spectra measured on the positions A–E, plus a control measurement (black curve) performed on a monolayer NbSe2 flake on a different sample (sample $\mathsf{C}$ , shown in the Supplementary Information). For all but the monolayer case, the Stokes and anti-Stokes $E^2_{2g}$ shear mode peaks are clearly visible. The mode frequency increases with the number of layers, as indicated by the dashed arrows. (c) Plot of the Raman shift of the shear mode as a function of the layer number (blue dots) and corresponding fit with the continuous model formula $\omega_s=\omega_0\cos (\pi/2N)$ (see text). From the fit we obtain $\omega_0=28.25\pm 0.10$ cm−1.

Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slide

This expression is the result of a very simple model which assumes the layers to be identical objects of mass m, each connected by the same spring constant to the nearest neighbors. The eigenmodes of this classical mechanics problem [29] are

where n is the mode index. For the shear mode $E^2_{2g}$ , the oscillation measured in Raman spectra corresponds to the highest frequency mode (i.e. n  =  1) [26, 30], which leads to the expression in equation (1).

Despite the simplicity of the classical model, its agreement with the experiment is remarkable. From the one-parameter fit we obtain the constant $\omega_0=28.25\pm0.10$ cm−1. This value agrees well with the results of other measurements reported in the literature [25, 26]. We stress that, by definition, monolayers do not support interlayer modes, as observed in the measurement (black curve in figure 2(b)).

From the measurements on sample $\mathsf{B}$ we also deduce that hBN encapsulation does not significantly affect the shear mode frequency. In fact, the shear mode Raman shifts measured on position D and E (trilayer and bilayer, respectively, see figure 2(a)) are located on the same curve as the other points measured on position A, B, and C, see figure 2(c). As discussed in the Supplementary Information, we have performed several control measurements with partially hBN-protected NbSe2 flakes. The difference between the Raman shift on bare and protected NbSe2 portions are always below the experimental uncertainty. This indicates that the differences in interlayer interaction and in layer density mechanically decouple the TMDC from the hBN.

So far, we have shown that performing the experiment in vacuum is the simplest way to perform a Raman measurement on sensitive van der Waals materials. However, this might be not always possible. The main goal of our work is to seek a method to reliably protect a van der Waals flake from oxidation in situations where it is not possible to operate in vacuum. The method we found is the same used to obtain high-mobility graphene devices, namely, a full encapsulation in hBN [22]. In graphene devices, the main role of the bottom layer is to keep the flake spatially separated from the SiO2 substrate surface, whose roughness and charge traps are highly detrimental for the mobility of the electron gas. In the present work, instead, the role of the bottom layer is to tightly seal the flake in between, due to the strong interaction between two adjacent hBN layers in the region outside, see sketch in figure 3(b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3. (a) Optical picture of sample $\mathsf{D}$ , a few-layer NbSe2 flake (indicated by a dashed line) fully encapsulated between two hBN flakes. (b) Sketch of the van der Waals stack. (c) Raman spectra in the range of the intralayer A1g and $E^1_{2g}$ modes. The spectra are measured in vacuum (black curve) and immediately after venting the chamber. (d) Series of Raman spectra measured after having exposed the sample to air for two days.

Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slide

From a practical point of view, one could obtain a fully encapsulated NbSe2 crystal using the simple stamping method described above. We empirically found, however, that this method does not work for NbSe2. This latter does not reliably stick on hBN when transferred at room temperature using PDMS only. Fortunately, the pick-up method is instead much more reliable, probably owing to the squeezing of the inter-flake bubbles at the higher temperature required for the pick-up stamping [22, 23].

Figure 3(a) shows an optical picture of a NbSe2 flake fully encapsulated in hBN, fabricated with the pick-up method. The key advantage of this configuration is that on the areas surrounding the NbSe2 the top hBN flake adheres on another hBN flake. It is known from the high mobility graphene technology that such layers are in tight (on the atomic scale) contact and therefore the stack is expected to be air-tight. We started our measurement session in vacuum. We then measured the Raman spectrum in the region around the A1g and $E^1_{2g}$ intralayer Raman modes [27, 28]. This Raman spectrum, measured with an illumination power of 2.6 mW and an integration time of 300 s, is shown in figure 3(c), black line. We then vented the system in air. We refocused the laser spot and immediately repeated the same measurement three times. We notice that, apart from a barely discernible decrease between the measurement in vacuum and the first measurement in air (which we attribute to a not perfect refocusing after the venting of the chamber), there is no significant change in the peak amplitude. This indicates that there is no appreciable degradation of the crystal induced by the light beam. To test the tightness of the stack over longer time scales, we left the system exposed to air for two days and then repeated the measurements (with illumination power 2.5 mW), which are shown in figure 3(d). Again, no degradation of the Raman signal was observed. We then left the sample in air for further three weeks. We remeasured the spectra without detecting any sign of degradation (see supplementary information (stacks.iop.org/TDM/7/015012/mmedia)). As far as we could verify, the protection provided by the full encapsulation is permanent.

Let us sum up the results of our observations so far: optical measurements on few-layer NbSe2 lead to a quick photo-induced oxidation within seconds even under an illumination of few $\mu$ W $\mu$ m−2. In vacuum (pressure of the order of 10−5 mbar) no signs of degradation are observed even for an illumination intensity of several mW $\mu$ m−2. A full encapsulation in hBN allows one to operate as if the sample were in vacuum, with no appreciable degradation under the same conditions. Finally, half encapsulation in hBN seems unable to prevent oxidation in samples kept in air for days.

The results on half encapsulated samples are the most interesting, since this method is the most commonly used in the literature to fabricate few-layer NbSe2-based devices for transport measurements [3133]. In fact, a common way to obtain devices for 4-terminal measurements consists in stamping the exfoliated flakes directly on pre-patterned Au electrodes and then stamping a hBN flake on top as a protection against oxidation. The question is then whether the hBN protection is indeed air-tight: our measurements above seem to indicate that this is not the case. However, it is important to determine whether the photo-induced oxidation observed, e.g. on sample $\mathsf{A}$ , is due to the SiO2 substrate or to oxygen molecules diffusing in between the layers from the environment.

A direct way to test this is to compare the Raman spectra measured on the same half encapsulated sample (i) in vacuum, (ii) immediately after venting in air, and (iii) after a given time of exposure to air, in the same way as done for sample $\mathsf{D}$ . The results of such test are shown in figure 4. Here we study a NbSe2 flake (sample $\mathsf{E}$ ) exfoliated in N2 atmosphere and half encapsulated in hBN before being removed from the glove box. The sample is mounted in the vacuum chamber and Raman spectra are measured at a pressure of few 10−5 mbar (panel (b)), with an illumination power of 2.5 mW and 300 s integration time. The chamber is vented with air and then several spectra are acquired in the next tens of minutes. In this case, no appreciable degradation is observed (panel (c)), except for a small decrease in the peak amplitude observed in the last spectrum, after more than 10 min of total illumination. The sample is then left in air for two days. Then, several Raman spectra are measured (panel (d)). Now, every measurement (300 s integration time with a power of 2.3 mW) produces a substantial decrease of the Raman peak amplitude, until only a faint trace is left after ten minutes of exposure. Similar results have been obtained on another half encapsulated sample, as discussed in the supplementary information.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. (a) Optical pictures of sample $\mathsf{E}$ , a half hBN encapsulated few-layer NbSe2 flake, taken before (left) and after (right) the Raman measurements. The edges of the top hBN flake lie outside the picture frame. (b) Sketch of the van der Waals stack. (c) Raman spectra in the range of the intralayer A1g and $E^1_{2g}$ modes, measured in vacuum (black curve) and immediately after venting the chamber. The inset shows the amplitude of the A1g mode for each spectrum. (d) Series of Raman spectra measured (as for sample $\mathsf{D}$ ) after having exposed the sample to air for two days. The inset shows the amplitude of the A1g mode for each spectrum.

Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slide

These results clearly indicate that half hBN encapsulation is not air-tight. The subnanometric roughness of the SiO2 surface allows oxygen molecules to slowly diffuse in between the interface SiO2-hBN. In fact, the typical atomic-scale stiffness of van der Waals materials makes it hard to tightly seal the rough surfaces of polycrystalline or amorphous substrates. On the other hand, the atomically smooth hBN–hBN interface is perfectly tight and ensures a long term and reliable protection against oxidation.

This behavior seems to be confirmed also by our experience with the contact resistance of Au or graphite contacts on NbSe2 in half encapsulated devices. We systematically observe that the contact resistance monotonically increases with the exposure time to air. Based on the above results, we suggest to use for transport experiments either a full encapsulation in hBN (as in [34]) or, if this is not possible or convenient, we recommend to keep the sample as much as possible in high vacuum and minimize the exposure time to air.

In conclusion, we have investigated how exposure to air affects Raman measurements on NbSe2, a representative van der Waals material which tends to oxidize in the presence of air and intense illumination. We found that samples in high vacuum are not affected by oxidation even under illumination intensities of several mW $\mu$ m−2. We demonstrated that full encapsulation in hBN effectively provides a long term protection against oxidation for samples kept in ambient conditions. The same does not hold for half encapsulated devices, where we observed a slow diffusion of oxygen in between the hBN layer and the SiO2 substrate.

Acknowledgments

The work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within Grants DFG SFB1277 (B04 and B06), GRK1570 and KO3612/3-1. Bulk NbSe2 was purchased from HQ Graphene.

References

  • [1]
    Novoselov K S, Mishchenko A, Carvalho A and Castro Neto A H 2016 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures Science 353 aac9439

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2]
    Geim A K and Grigorieva I V 2013 Van der Waals heterostructures Nature 499 419

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3]
    Li Q, Zhou Q, Shi L, Chen Q and Wang J 2019 Recent advances in oxidation and degradation mechanisms of ultrathin 2D materials under ambient conditions and their passivation strategies J. Mater. Chem. A 7 4291–312

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4]
    Castellanos-Gomez A, Buscema M, Molenaar R, Singh V, Janssen L, van der Zant H S J and Steele G A 2014 Deterministic transfer of two-dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelastic stamping 2D Mater. 1 011002

    IOPscienceGoogle Scholar

  • [5]
    Wood J D, Wells S A, Jariwala D, Chen K-S, Cho E, Sangwan V K, Liu X, Lauhon L J, Marks T J and Hersam M C 2014 Effective passivation of exfoliated black phosphorus transistors against ambient degradation Nano Lett. 14 6964–70

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6]
    Ye F, Lee J, Hu J, Mao Z, Wei J and Feng P X-L 2016 Environmental instability and degradation of single- and few-layer WTe2 nanosheets in ambient conditions Small 12 5802–8

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7]
    Sun L et al 2017 Suppression of the charge density wave state in two-dimensional 1T-TiSe2 by atmospheric oxidation Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 56 8981–5

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8]
    Favron A, Gaufrès E, Fossard F, Phaneuf-L’Heureux A-L, Tang N Y-W, Lévesque P L, Loiseau A, Leonelli R, Francoeur S and Martel R 2015 Photooxidation and quantum confinement effects in exfoliated black phosphorus Nat. Mater. 14 826

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9]
    Ferrari A C et al 2006 Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 187401

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10]
    Lee C, Yan H, Brus L E, Heinz T F, Hone J and Ryu S 2010 Anomalous lattice vibrations of single- and few-layer MoS2 ACS Nano 4 2695–700

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]
    Yan J, Zhang Y, Kim P and Pinczuk A 2007 Electric field effect tuning of electron–phonon coupling in graphene Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 166802

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12]
    Heydrich S, Hirmer M, Preis C, Korn T, Eroms J, Weiss D and Schüller C 2010 Scanning Raman spectroscopy of graphene antidot lattices: evidence for systematic p-type doping Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 043113

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]
    Chakraborty B, Bera A, Muthu D V S, Bhowmick S, Waghmare U V and Sood A K 2012 Symmetry-dependent phonon renormalization in monolayer MoS2 transistor Phys. Rev. B 85 161403

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14]
    Huang M, Yan H, Heinz T F and Hone J 2010 Probing strain-induced electronic structure change in graphene by Raman spectroscopy Nano Lett. 10 4074

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15]
    Rice C, Young R J, Zan R, Bangert U, Wolverson D, Georgiou T, Jalil R and Novoselov K S 2013 Raman-scattering measurements and first-principles calculations of strain-induced phonon shifts in monolayer MoS2 Phys. Rev. B 87 081307

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16]
    Tan P H et al 2012 The shear mode of multilayer graphene Nat. Mater. 11 294–300

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17]
    Plechinger G, Heydrich S, Eroms J, Weiss D, Schüller C and Korn T 2012 Raman spectroscopy of the interlayer shear mode in few-layer MoS2 flakes Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 101906

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]
    Zhang X, Han W P, Wu J B, Milana S, Lu Y, Li Q Q, Ferrari A C and Tan P H 2012 Shear and layer breathing modes in multilayer MoS2 Phys. Rev. B 87 115413

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]
    Nagler P, Plechinger G, Schüller C and Korn T 2016 Observation of anisotropic interlayer raman modes in few-layer ReS2 Physica Status Solidi RRL 10 185–9

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]
    El-Bana M S, Wolverson D, Russo S, Balakrishnan G, Paul D M and Bending S J 2013 Superconductivity in two-dimensional NbSe2 field effect transistors Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26 125020

    IOPscienceGoogle Scholar

  • [21]
    Cao Y et al 2015 Quality heterostructures from two-dimensional crystals unstable in air by their assembly in inert atmosphere Nano Lett. 4914–21

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22]
    Wang L et al 2013 One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material Science 342 614–7

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]
    Zomer P J, Guimarães M H D, Brant J C, Tombros N and van Wees B J 2014 Fast pick up technique for high quality heterostructures of bilayer graphene and hexagonal boron nitride Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 013101

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24]
    Plechinger G, Mooshammer F, Castellanos-Gomez A, Steele G A, Schüller C and Korn T 2015 Optical spectroscopy of interlayer coupling in artificially stacked MoS2 layers 2D Mater. 2 034016

    IOPscienceGoogle Scholar

  • [25]
    Xi X, Zhao L, Wang Z, Berger H, Forró L, Shan J and Mak K F 2015 Strongly enhanced charge-density-wave order in monolayer NbSe2 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 765

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26]
    He R, van Baren J, Yan J-A, Xi X, Ye Z, Ye G, Lu I-H, Leong S M and Lui C H 2016 Interlayer breathing and shear modes in NbSe2 atomic layers 2D Mater. 3 031008

    IOPscienceGoogle Scholar

  • [27]
    Wang C and Chen J 1974 Raman spectrum of metallic layered compound NbSe2 Solid State Commun. 14 1145–8

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28]
    Pereira C M and Liang W Y 1982 Raman studies of the normal phase of 2h-NbSe2 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 15 L991–5

    IOPscienceGoogle Scholar

  • [29]
    Thornton S T and Marion J B 2003 Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems 5th edn (Andover: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning)

    Google Scholar

  • [30]
    Lui C H, Ye Z, Keiser C, Xiao X and He R 2014 Temperature-activated layer-breathing vibrations in few-layer graphene Nano Lett. 14 4615–21

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31]
    Xi X, Wang Z, Zhao W, Park J-H, Law K T, Berger H, Forró L, Shan J and Mak K F 2015 Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe2 atomic layers Nat. Phys. 12 139

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32]
    Xi X, Berger H, Forró L, Shan J and Mak K F 2016 Gate tuning of electronic phase transitions in two-dimensional NbSe2 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 106801

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33]
    Paradiso N, Nguyen A-T, Kloss K E and Strunk C 2019 Phase slip lines in superconducting few-layer NbSe2 crystals 2D Mater. 6 025039

    IOPscienceGoogle Scholar

  • [34]
    Tsen A W, Hunt B, Kim Y D, Yuan Z J, Jia S, Cava R J, Hone J, Kim P, Dean C R and Pasupathy A N 2015 Nature of the quantum metal in a two-dimensional crystalline superconductor Nat. Phys. 12 208

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Export references: BibTeX RIS

Link to supplementary data
Supplementary information.