cpc Chinese Physics C 1674-1137 Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd cpc_43_10_103101 10.1088/1674-1137/43/10/103101 43/10/103101 Paper Particles and fields Symmetry properties of nonlocal quark bilinear operators on a Lattice (LP3 Collaboration) *

JWC is partly supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (105-2112-M-002-017-MY3) and the Kenda Foundation. TI is supported by Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (16DZ2260200). TI and LCJ are supported by the Department of Energy, Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) funding of BNL (DE-EC0012704). The work of HL is supported by US National Science Foundation (PHY 1653405). JHZ is supported by the SFB/TRR-55 grant “Hadron Physics from Lattice QCD”, and a grant from National Science Foundation of China (11405104). YZ is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, from DE-SC0011090 and within the framework of the TMD Topical Collaboration

Symmetry properties of nonlocal quark bilinear operators on a Lattice (LP3 Collaboration)
Chen Jiunn-Wei 1 2 Ishikawa Tomomi 3 Jin Luchang 4 5 Lin Huey-Wen 6 7 Zhang Jian-Hui 8 Zhao Yong 2 Department of Physics, Center for Theoretical Physics, and Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106 Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 T. D. Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240 Physics Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3046 RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 Department of Computational Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg jwc@phys.ntu.edu.tw tomomi.ik@gmail.com jianhui.zhang@ur.de 10 2019 17 8 2019 43 10 103101 1 5 2019 17 8 2019 1 5 2019 © 2019 Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd 2019 Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Article funded by SCOAP3 and published under licence by Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd Abstract

Using symmetry properties, we determine the mixing pattern of a class of nonlocal quark bilinear operators containing a straight Wilson line along a spatial direction. We confirm the previous study that mixing among the lowest dimensional operators, which have a mass dimension equal to three, can occur if chiral symmetry is broken in the lattice action. For higher dimensional operators, we find that the dimension-three operators will always mix with dimension-four operators, even if chiral symmetry is preserved. Also, the number of dimension-four operators involved in the mixing is large, and hence it is impractical to remove the mixing by the improvement procedure. Our result is important for determining the Bjorken-x dependence of the parton distribution functions using the quasi-distribution method on a Euclidean lattice. The requirement of using large hadron momentum in this approach makes the control of errors from dimension-four operators even more important.

Lattice QCD operator mixing nonlocal quark bilinear 12.38.Gc

Article funded by SCOAP3

arxivppt 1710.01089
Introduction

Controlling the systematic uncertainties is critical for obtaining meaningful results in lattice QCD. For example, the nonperturbative renormalization method of the Rome-Southampton collaboration [1] has been widely used to convert from the lattice scheme to continuum schemes, avoiding the introduction of errors from the slowly converging lattice perturbation theory. Another example is the use of Symanzik improvement [2, 3] to systematically reduce discretization errors due to nonzero lattice spacing a. Since it is crucial to understand the mixing patterns of the operators involved, understanding the symmetries of a problem provides a powerful nonperturbative method. Symmetries could protect certain mixings from happening, while those not protected by symmetries could occur under quantum corrections. Although symmetry considerations do not provide a quantitative analysis of the mixing, they do provide a complete mixing pattern among operators in the problem.

In this work, we use the symmetries of lattice QCD to analyze the mixing pattern of a class of nonlocal quark bilinear operators defined in Eq. (27). Their renormalization in the continuum has been discussed since the 1980s [4, 5]. In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the renormalization of these operators in the context of methods for calculating the Bjorken-x dependence of the hadron parton distribution functions (PDFs) using the lattice QCD, the quasi-PDF method [6] and its variations [7, 8]. For recent progress in this area, see Refs. [956]. A special feature of these nonlocal quark bilinears is that the Wilson line connecting the quark fields receives power-divergent contributions. A nonperturbative subtraction of the power divergence was proposed in Refs. [33, 34, 57] by recasting the Wilson line as a heavy quark field in the auxiliary field approach [4, 5] such that the counterterm needed to subtract the power divergence is just the counterterm for heavy quark mass renormalization. The renormalization of the nonlocal quark bilinears in the continuum was studied in Refs. [19, 35, 36] , on a lattice in Ref. [27], and in nonperturbative renormalization schemes in [14, 15].

A lattice theory has fewer symmetries than its corresponding continuum theory. This implies that there will be more mixing among the operators in a lattice theory than in the corresponding continuum theory. For example, a pioneering one-loop lattice perturbation theory calculation using Wilson fermions showed that the breaking of chiral symmetry for the Wilson fermions induces the mixing shown in Eq. (34) [26]. In this work, instead of performing explicit computations, we use symmetries to systematically study the mixing patterns among nonlocal quark bilinears (part of this work was reported in [15, 58]). We study not only the mixing among the lowest dimensional nonlocal quark bilinears of mass dimension-three as was done in Ref. [26], but also the mixing between dimension-three and dimension-four operators, which cannot be avoided even if chiral symmetry is preserved

This is different for the case of local operators, where mixing between the dimension three and four operators is forbidden by symmetries. If a lattice action is -improved, then the mixing of dimension three and four local operators is forbidden, but the mixing between nonlocal operators is still allowed.

. This feature is confirmed by the computation of an example one-loop diagram.

Our study is particularly relevant to the quasi-PDF approach, which receives power corrections in inverse powers of hadron momentum. It is important to find the window where hadron momentum is large enough to suppress power corrections (good progress was made using momentum smearing in [13, 59]), but small enough that mixing with dimension-four operators is under control. In the following, we first review the symmetry analysis of local quark bilinear operators, and then move to the nonlocal ones.

Review of local quark bilinear operators

If the term is neglected, the lattice action exhibits important discrete symmetries: the action is invariant under discrete parity ( ), time reversal ( ) and charge conjugation ( ) transformations (see e.g. Ref. [60]). Chiral symmetry, which is a continuous symmetry, however, might be broken after the fermion fields are discretized. In this section, we review the symmetry properties for a specific set of local quark bilinear operators under these transformations. We then extend the analysis to nonlocal quark bilinear operators in the next section. The importance of these analyses is that if two operators transform differently, then the symmetries will protect them from mixing with each other under quantum corrections to all orders in the coupling. Operators not protected from mixing by the symmetries will, in general, mix.

<inline-formula> <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal P} $?></tex-math> <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_43_10_103101_M5.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/> </inline-formula>, <inline-formula> <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal T} $?></tex-math> <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_43_10_103101_M6.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/> </inline-formula>, <inline-formula> <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal C} $?></tex-math> <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_43_10_103101_M7.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/> </inline-formula> and axial transformations

In this subsection, we summarize the transformations of fields under , , and the axial transformation (the vector transformation in chiral symmetry is conserved for all operators that we study). We work in the Euclidean spacetime with coordinates (1,2,3,4) throughout this paper. Gamma matrices are chosen to be Hermitian: , and .

Since there is no distinction between time and space in the Euclidean space, the parity transformation, denoted with , can be defined with respect to any direction.

where is the vector x with the flipped sign, except for the -direction.

Similarly, the time reversal transformation, denoted as , can be generalized in any direction in the Euclidean space.

where is the vector x with the flipped sign in the -direction.

Charge conjugation transforms particles into antiparticles,

and

The continuous axial rotation ( ) of the fermion fields is

where is the x-independent rotation angle of the global transformation

The anomaly induced by the single-flavor axial rotation is identical for all the operators that we study. Hence, it can be safely neglected in the operator classification.

. The explicit axial symmetry breaking pattern induced by the quark mass m can be studied by introducing a spurious transformation

so that the quark mass term is invariant under this extended axial transformation.

Dimension-three local operators

We now study the transformation properties of a class of local quark bilinear operators of the form

with

where . Quantum loop effects for these operators are in powers of . The Hermitian conjugate is

where , which has a value of either or , satisfies

Therefore, depending on , the expectation value of can be purely real or imaginary.

Under , , and , the local quark bilinear transforms as

either stays invariant (even, E) or changes sign (odd, O) under a transformation. The results are summarized in Table 1. Operators of different do not mix under renormalization, since they transform differently under or . alone does not protect the operators from mixing with each other.

Properties of the dimension-three local operator under parity ( ), time reversal ( ), charge conjugation ( ) and axial ( ) transformations. E and O stand for even and odd, while I and V stand for invariant and variant under transformations.

E E O O O
E O O E O /E
E O O E O
E E O O O /E
E O E E O
V I V I V

Under an axial rotation (with Eq. (14) included), is either invariant (I) or variant (V), as shown in Table 1. Some lattice fermions, such as Wilson fermions, break the axial symmetry, but from the above discussion we see that axial symmetry is not essential for protecting from mixing. Only or is needed.

Dimension-four local operators

For dimension-four, we can further classify the operators into p type and m type operators, which have one more insertion of derivative or quark mass, respectively, compared with the dimension-three operators. Here p denotes a typical momentum in the external state. It is useful to define the covariant derivatives, and , acting on a field ,

The Euclidean four-dimensional rotational symmetry dictates that p type operators are constructed by inserting and into :

It can be shown that these operators transform in the same way as under and , while under ,

with the operators and transforming into each other. Therefore, it is convenient to define the combinations

which are either even or odd under . The transformation properties of the p type operators are listed in Table 2. By comparing with Table 1, we observe that , and symmetries do not protect from mixing with , but the axial symmetry does. So, if the lattice theory preserves axial or chiral symmetry, then the dimension-three and p type dimension-four operators studied above will not mix.

Transformation properties of the dimension-four type local operators . Notation is the same as in Table 1.

E E O O O
E O O E O /E
E O O E O
E E O O O /E
O E O O E
E O E E O
I V I V I

We now consider the m type operators. The only operator that appears at this order is

which transforms in the same way as under , and . However, it transforms differently from under .

Therefore, we conclude that if the lattice theory preserves axial or chiral symmetry, then the dimension-three and dimension-four operators (including both the p type and m type operators) studied above will not mix.

Nonlocal quark bilinear operators

Having reviewed the operator-mixing properties of the local quark bilinears, we now apply the analysis to a specific type of nonlocal quark bilinears.

Dimension-three nonlocal operators

We are interested in the nonlocal quark bilinear operators with quark fields separated by in the z-direction:

where a straight Wilson line is added such that the operators are gauge invariant. Treating the z-direction differently from the other directions, we write

where . These operators receive quantum loop corrections as powers of and [19, 35, 36]. It is important to keep in mind that one cannot take the continuum limit of the matrix elements of these operators.

Under and ,

The transformations could change the sign of , so it is convenient to define

whose Hermitian conjugate yields

Thus, the expectation value of is either purely real or purely imaginary, depending on . Under ,

The transformation properties of are listed in Table 3. We see that , and symmetries cannot protect the mixing between and or between and operators of dimension-three. This can be summarized as

Transformation properties of the dimension-three nonlocal operators . . Other notation is the same as in Table 1.

E O E O E O O E
E/O E/O O/E O/E O/E E/O O/E E/O
O/E E/O E/O O/E
E/O E/O O/E O/E O/E E/O O/E E/O
E O E O E O O E
E O E O
E/O O/E O/E E/O E/O E/O O/E O/E
V I I V I I V V

which is consistent with the mixing pattern found using the lattice perturbation theory in Refs. [26, 27]. However, if the lattice theory preserves axial or chiral symmetry, then none of the dimension-three operators will mix with each other.

The mixing among dimension-three operators of different cannot be excluded by symmetries, but diagrammatic analysis excludes this possibility to all orders in the strong coupling constant expansion [35]. The mixing of dimension-three with dimension-four operators of different has not been systematically studied yet. However, the one-loop example in Eq. (48) is consistent with no mixing among operators of different .

Dimension-four nonlocal operators

We now extend the discussion for p type and m type local operators to nonlocal ones. We can insert at any point on the Wilson line. The symmetry properties will not depend on where is inserted.

where . The z-direction is treated differently by writing and , and .

As in the local quark bilinear case, inserting and does not change the transformation properties under and . These operators transform in the same way as . It is useful to define combinations that are even or odd under and :

Under , these operators transform as

Hence, we define the combinations

such that

Their properties under , and are listed in Table 4. Comparing with Table 3, we find that , and symmetries do not protect from mixing with or . If the lattice theory preserves axial or chiral symmetry, then the mixing with is forbidden, but the mixing with is still allowed. Since the Wilson line can be described as a heavy quark propagator in the auxiliary field approach [19, 27, 35], this is analogous to the static heavy-light system, which has p type discretization errors even if the light quarks respect chiral symmetry. Note that Ref. [58] did not include the operators with different from and . Since there are many more p type operators now, it makes the nonperturbative improvement program advocated in Ref. [58] much more difficult, and perhaps impractical.

Transformation properties of the dimension-four type nonlocal operators . . Other notation is the same as in Tab. 1.

E O E O E O O E
E/O E/O O/E O/E O/E E/O O/E E/O
O/E E/O E/O O/E
E/O E/O O/E O/E O/E E/O O/E E/O
E O E O E O O E
E O E O
( ) O/E E/O E/O O/E O/E O/E E/O E/O
( ) E/O O/E O/E E/O E/O E/O O/E O/E
I V V I V V I I

The m type nonlocal bilinear is

It has the same transformation properties as under , and but is different for the chiral rotation. However, chiral symmetry does not prevent from mixing with the m type operator .

A mixing example in perturbative theory

In the previous section, it was shown that , , , and chiral symmetries cannot protect dimension-three nonlocal quark bilinears from mixing with dimension-four operators. This is a distinct feature, different from local quark bilinears in which dimension-three operators are protected from mixing with dimension-four operators. Here, we use the diagram shown in Fig. 1 to demonstrate where the effect comes from. For our purpose, we can simplify the calculation by taking the Feynman gauge and the limit of small external momenta and quark masses, and we work in the continuum limit with appropriate UV and IR regulators imposed implicitly. The one-loop amputated Green function in Fig. 1, , then yields

One of the one-loop Feynman diagrams for the nonlocal quark bilinear. and are incoming and outgoing external momenta, respectively.

where the coefficients are

and where . It is easy to see that when (corresponding to a local quark bilinear), the mixings with all dimension-four operators vanish, but when (corresponding to a nonlocal quark bilinear), the mixing with dimension-four operators appears even though the theory has , , , and chiral symmetries.

Summary

We have used the symmetry properties of nonlocal quark bilinear operators under parity, time reversal and chiral or axial transformations to study the possible mixing among these operators. Below, we summarize our findings.

1) If the lattice theory preserves chiral symmetry, then the dimension-three nonlocal quark bilinear operators of Eq. (31) are protected from mixing with each other, but they are not protected from mixing with the dimension-four operators of Eqs. (43), (44) and (47) with all possible values of satisfying :

where is defined in Eq. (18). This mixing pattern is confirmed by an example calculation for a one-loop diagram, as shown in Sec. 3.3. Since there are many operators in Eqs. (54)–(56), it is impractical to remove the mixing using the improvement procedure.

2) If the lattice theory breaks chiral symmetry, then the dimension-three nonlocal quark bilinear mixes with

The operator not only mixes with all the operators in Eqs. (54)–(56), but also with , and for all possible values of satisfying .

This study is particularly relevant for the quasi-PDF approach, which receives power corrections in inverse powers of hadron momentum. It is important to find a window where hadron momentum is large enough to suppress power corrections, but at the same time the mixing with p type dimension-four operators is under control. For future work, in light of the similarity between the Wilson line and the heavy quark propagator, it would be valuable to apply techniques developed for the heavy quark effective field theory on the lattice [61, 62] and the associated treatments to improve lattice artifacts [6368].

References Martinelli G. Pittori C. Sachrajda C. T. et al Nucl. Phys. B 1995 445 81 arXiv: hep-lat/9411010 Symanzik K. Nucl. Phys. B 1983 226 187 M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Commun. Math. Phys., 97: 59 (1985), [Erratum: Commun. Math. Phys., 98: 433 (1985)] Craigie N. S. Dorn H. Nucl. Phys. B 1981 185 204 Dorn H. Fortsch. Phys. 1986 34 11 Ji X. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013 110 262002 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.262002 arXiv: 1305.1539 Ma Y.-Q. Qiu J.-W. 2014 arXiv: 1404.6860 Radyushkin A. V. Phys. Rev. D 2017 96 034025 arXiv: 1705.01488 Lin H.-W. Chen J.-W. Cohen S. D. et al Phys. Rev. D 2015 91 054510 arXiv: 1402.1462 Chen J.-W. Cohen S. D. Ji X. et al Nucl. Phys. B 2016 911 246 arXiv: 1603.06664 Lin H.-W. Chen J.-W. Ishikawa T. et al 2017 arXiv: 1708.05301 Alexandrou C. Cichy K. Drach V. et al Phys. Rev. D 2015 92 014502 arXiv: 1504.07455 Alexandrou C. Cichy K. Constantinou M. et al Phys. Rev. D 2017 96 014513 arXiv: 1610.03689 Alexandrou C. Cichy K. Constantinou M. et al Nucl. Phys. B 2017 923 394 arXiv: 1706.00265 Chen J.-W. Ishikawa T. Jin L. et al Phys. Rev. D 2018 97 014505 arXiv: 1706.01295 Zhang J.-H. Chen J.-W. Ji X. et al Phys. Rev. D 2017 95 094514 arXiv: 1702.00008 Chen J.-W. Jin L. Lin H.-W. et al 2017 arXiv: 1712.10025 Xiong X. Ji X. Zhang J.-H. et al Phys. Rev. D 2014 90 014051 arXiv: 1310.7471 Ji X. Zhang J.-H. Phys. Rev. D 2015 92 034006 arXiv: 1505.07699 Ji X. Schäfer A. Xiong X. et al Phys. Rev. D 2015 92 014039 arXiv: 1506.00248 Xiong X. Zhang J.-H. Phys. Rev. D 2015 92 054037 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.054037 arXiv: 1509.08016 Ji X. Sun P. Xiong X. et al Phys. Rev. D 2015 91 074009 arXiv: 1405.7640 Monahan C. 2017 arXiv: 1710.04607 Ji X. Jin L.-C. Yuan F. et al 2018 arXiv: 1801.05930 Stewart I. W. Zhao Y. 2017 arXiv: 1709.04933 Constantinou M. Panagopoulos H. Phys. Rev. D 2017 96 054506 arXiv: 1705.11193 Green J. Jansen K. Steffens F. 2017 arXiv: 1707.07152 Izubuchi T. Ji X. Jin L. et al 2018 arXiv: 1801.03917 Xiong X. Luu T. Meißner U.-G. 2017 arXiv: 1705.00246 Wang W. Zhao S. Zhu R. Eur. Phys. J. C 2018 78 147 arXiv: 1708.02458 Wang W. Zhao S. 2017 arXiv: 1712.09247 Xu J. Zhang Q.-A. Zhao S. 2018 arXiv: 1804.01042 Ishikawa T. Ma Y.-Q. Qiu J.-W. et al 2016 arXiv: 1609.02018 Chen J.-W. Ji X. Zhang J.-H. Nucl. Phys. B 2017 915 1 arXiv: 1609.08102 Ji X. Zhang J.-H. Zhao Y. 2017 arXiv: 1706.08962 Ishikawa T. Ma Y.-Q. Qiu J.-W. et al Phys. Rev. D 2017 96 094019 arXiv: 1707.03107 Chen J.-W. Ishikawa T. Jin L. 2017 arXiv: 1710.01089 Chen J.-W. Ishikawa T. Jin L. 2017 arXiv: 1711.07858 Li H.-n. Phys. Rev. D 2016 94 074036 arXiv: 1602.07575 Monahan C. Orginos K. JHEP 2017 03 116 arXiv: 1612.01584 Radyushkin A. Phys. Lett. B 2017 767 314 arXiv: 1612.05170 Rossi G. C. Testa M. Phys. Rev. D 2017 96 014507 arXiv: 1706.04428 Carlson C. E. Freid M. Phys. Rev. D 2017 95 094504 arXiv: 1702.05775 Ji X. Zhang J.-H. Zhao Y. Nucl. Phys. B 2017 924 366 arXiv: 1706.07416 Chen J.-W. Jin L. Lin H.-W. et al 2018 arXiv: 1803.04393 Alexandrou C. Cichy K. Constantinou M. et al 2018 arXiv: 1803.02685 Gamberg L. Kang Z.-B. Vitev I. et al Phys. Lett. B 2015 743 112 arXiv: 1412.3401 Nam S.-i. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2017 32 1750218 arXiv: 1704.03824 Broniowski W. Ruiz Arriola E. Phys. Lett. B 2017 773 385 arXiv: 1707.09588 Jia Y. Liang S. Li L. et al JHEP 2017 11 151 arXiv: 1708.09379 Hobbs T. J. Phys. Rev. D 2018 97 054028 arXiv: 1708.05463 Jia Y. Xiong X. Phys. Rev. D 2016 94 094005 arXiv: 1511.04430 Chen J.-W. Jin L. Lin H.-W. et al 2018 arXiv: 1804.01483 Orginos K. Radyushkin A. Karpie J. et al Phys. Rev. D 2017 96 094503 arXiv: 1706.05373 Radyushkin A. 2018 arXiv: 1801.03023 Zhang J.-H. Chen J.-W. Monahan C. 2018 arXiv: 1801.03023 Musch B. U. Hagler P. Negele J. W. et al Phys. Rev. D 2011 83 094507 arXiv: 1011.1213 Ishikawa T. EPJ Web Conf. 2018 175 06028 10.1051/epjconf/201817506028 arXiv: 1802.02333 Bali G. S. Lang B. Musch B. U. et al Phys. Rev. D 2016 93 094515 arXiv: 1602.05525 Gattringer C. Lang C. B. Lect. Notes Phys. 2010 788 1 10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3 R. Sommer, in Modern perspectives in lattice QCD: Quantum field theory and high performance computing. Proceedings, International School, 93rd Session, Les Houches, France, August 3-28, 2009(2010), pp. 517-590, 1008.0710, URL http://inspirehep.net/record/864434/files/arXiv:1008.0710.pdf Sommer R. Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 2015 261-262 338 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2015.03.022 arXiv: 1501.03060 Becirevic D. Reyes J. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 2004 129 435 Blossier B. Phys. Rev. D 2007 76 114513 arXiv: 0705.0283 Ishikawa T. Aoki Y. Flynn J. M. et al JHEP 2011 05 040 arXiv: 1101.1072 Sheikholeslami B. Wohlert R. Nucl. Phys. B 1985 259 572 Heatlie G. Martinelli G. Pittori C. et al Nucl. Phys. B 1991 352 266 Borrelli A. Pittori C. Frezzotti R. et al Nucl. Phys. B 1993 409 382