Direkt zum Inhalt

Kaunzinger, Ivo ; Kramer, Bernd

Electrosensory phase sensitivity in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia in the detection of signals similar to its own

Kaunzinger, Ivo and Kramer, Bernd (1996) Electrosensory phase sensitivity in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia in the detection of signals similar to its own. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 179 (3), pp. 323-330.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 05 Aug 2009 13:36
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.2111


Abstract

The electric organ discharge (EOD) of the South American knifefish Eigenmannia sp. is a permanently present wave signal of usually constant amplitude and frequency (similar to a sine wave). A fish perceives discharges of other fish as a modulation of its own. At frequency identity (∆F = 0 Hz) the phase difference between a fish's own electric discharge and that of another fish affects the ...

The electric organ discharge (EOD) of the South American knifefish Eigenmannia sp. is a permanently present wave signal of usually constant amplitude and frequency (similar to a sine wave). A fish perceives discharges of other fish as a modulation of its own. At frequency identity (∆F = 0 Hz) the phase difference between a fish's own electric discharge and that of another fish affects the superimposed waveform. It was unclear whether or not the electrosensory stimulus- intensity threshold as behaviourally determined depends on the phase difference between a fish's own EOD and a sine-wave stimulus (at ∆F = 0 Hz). Also the strength of the jamming avoidance response (JAR), a discharge frequency shift away from a stimulus that is sufficiently close to the EOD frequency, as a function of phase difference was studied. Sine-wave stimuli were both frequency-clamped and phase-locked to a fish's discharge frequency (∆F = 0Hz). In food-rewarded fish, the electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold depended significantly on the phase difference between a fish's discharge and the stimulus. Stimulus-intensity thresholds were low (down to 3 µV/cm, peak-to-peak) when the superimposed complex wave changed such that the shift in zero-crossings times relative to the original EOD was large but amplitude change minimal; stimulus-intensity thresholds were high (up to 16.9 µV/cm, peak-to-peak) when the shift in zero-crossings times was small but amplitude change maximal. Similar results were obtained for the non-conditioned JAR: at constant supra-threshold stimulus intensities and ∆F = 0 Hz, the phase difference significantly affected the strength of the JAR, although variability between individuals was higher than that observed in the conditioned experiments.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleJournal of Comparative Physiology A
Volume:179
Number of Issue or Book Chapter:3
Page Range:pp. 323-330
DateSeptember 1996
InstitutionsBiology, Preclinical Medicine > Institut für Zoologie > Alumni or Retired > Verhaltensbiologie und Verhaltensphysiologie (Prof. Dr. Bernd Kramer)
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1007/BF00194986DOI
KeywordsElectric organ discharge; Signal detection; Phase sensitivity; Electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold; Jamming avoidance response
Dewey Decimal Classification500 Science > 570 Life sciences
500 Science > 590 Zoological sciences
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgYes
Item ID2111

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben