| Download ( PDF | 829kB) Nur für Mitarbeiter des Archivs |
Electrosensory phase sensitivity in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia in the detection of signals similar to its own
Kaunzinger, Ivo und Kramer, Bernd (1996) Electrosensory phase sensitivity in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia in the detection of signals similar to its own. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 179 (3), S. 323-330.Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 05 Aug 2009 13:36
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.2111
Zusammenfassung
The electric organ discharge (EOD) of the South American knifefish Eigenmannia sp. is a permanently present wave signal of usually constant amplitude and frequency (similar to a sine wave). A fish perceives discharges of other fish as a modulation of its own. At frequency identity (∆F = 0 Hz) the phase difference between a fish's own electric discharge and that of another fish affects the ...
The electric organ discharge (EOD) of the South American knifefish Eigenmannia sp. is a permanently present wave signal of usually constant amplitude and frequency (similar to a sine wave). A fish perceives discharges of other fish as a modulation of its own. At frequency identity (∆F = 0 Hz) the phase difference between a fish's own electric discharge and that of another fish affects the superimposed waveform. It was unclear whether or not the electrosensory stimulus- intensity threshold as behaviourally determined depends on the phase difference between a fish's own EOD and a sine-wave stimulus (at ∆F = 0 Hz). Also the strength of the jamming avoidance response (JAR), a discharge frequency shift away from a stimulus that is sufficiently close to the EOD frequency, as a function of phase difference was studied. Sine-wave stimuli were both frequency-clamped and phase-locked to a fish's discharge frequency (∆F = 0Hz). In food-rewarded fish, the electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold depended significantly on the phase difference between a fish's discharge and the stimulus. Stimulus-intensity thresholds were low (down to 3 µV/cm, peak-to-peak) when the superimposed complex wave changed such that the shift in zero-crossings times relative to the original EOD was large but amplitude change minimal; stimulus-intensity thresholds were high (up to 16.9 µV/cm, peak-to-peak) when the shift in zero-crossings times was small but amplitude change maximal. Similar results were obtained for the non-conditioned JAR: at constant supra-threshold stimulus intensities and ∆F = 0 Hz, the phase difference significantly affected the strength of the JAR, although variability between individuals was higher than that observed in the conditioned experiments.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Journal of Comparative Physiology A | ||||
| Band: | 179 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels: | 3 | ||||
| Seitenbereich: | S. 323-330 | ||||
| Datum | September 1996 | ||||
| Institutionen | Biologie und Vorklinische Medizin > Institut für Zoologie > Entpflichtet bzw. im Ruhestand > Verhaltensbiologie und Verhaltensphysiologie (Prof. Dr. Bernd Kramer) | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | Electric organ discharge; Signal detection; Phase sensitivity; Electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold; Jamming avoidance response | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 590 Tiere (Zoologie) | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 2111 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik