Direkt zum Inhalt

Jenisch, Teresa ; Zeman, Michael ; Koller, Michael ; Märker, David ; Helbig, Horst ; Hermann, Wolfgang

Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical outcome with special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon

Jenisch, Teresa, Zeman, Michael, Koller, Michael, Märker, David, Helbig, Horst und Hermann, Wolfgang (2017) Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical outcome with special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon. Clinical Ophthalmology 2017 (11), S. 1127-1134.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 22 Jan 2018 13:57
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.35165


Zusammenfassung

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole (MH) surgery with special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon. Methods: A total of 225 surgeries on idiopathic MHs (IMHs) performed by 6 surgeons with a mean follow-up period of 20.5 months were reviewed in this retrospective study. Outcome parameters focused on IMH ...

Purpose:
The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole (MH) surgery with special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon.

Methods:
A total of 225 surgeries on idiopathic MHs (IMHs) performed by 6 surgeons with a mean follow-up period of 20.5 months were reviewed in this retrospective study. Outcome parameters focused on IMH closure, complications and visual acuity improvement. The results of MH surgeries performed by experienced surgeons were compared to those of surgeons in training.

Results:
The average MH size was 381 µm (standard deviation [SD]=168). Brilliant blue G (BBG) for internal limiting membrane (ILM) staining was used in 109 (48%) eyes and indocyanine green (ICG) in 116 (52%) eyes. As endotamponade, 20% SF6 was used in 38 (17%) cases, 16% C2F6 in 33 (15%) cases and 16% C3F8 in 154 (68%) cases. IMH closure was achieved in 194 eyes (86%). Mean preoperative visual acuity was 0.84 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR; SD=0.29, range: 0.3–1.5); surgery led to a mean improvement of 0.40 (SD=0.37) log MAR. Although the MH closure rate was the same using BBG or ICG for ILM peeling, visual acuity improvement was better in eyes peeled with BBG compared to eyes peeled with ICG (log MAR: BBG: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.32, 0.44] vs ICG: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.54], P=0.029). Surgeons with previous experience in vitreoretinal surgery of ≥6 years achieved better visual outcomes compared to surgeons with 0–3 years of experience, regardless of the MH size, preoperative visual acuity, time to follow-up or dye used for ILM peeling (0–3 years [0.27, ∆log MAR] vs ≥6 years [0.43, ∆log MAR], P=0.009).

Conclusion:
Our results indicate that vitrectomy with ILM peeling performed by non-experienced surgeons is a safe procedure leading to good anatomical and functional results. Very experienced surgeons may achieve even better functional outcomes.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftClinical Ophthalmology
Verlag:Dove
Band:2017
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:11
Seitenbereich:S. 1127-1134
Datum13 Juni 2017
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Augenheilkunde
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.2147/OPTH.S125561DOI
Stichwörter / Keywordsidiopathic macular hole, vitrectomy, ILM peeling, intraocular tamponade, brilliant peel
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-351655
Dokumenten-ID35165

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben