| Download ( PDF | 1MB) |
Third-party interventions keep social partners from exchanging affiliative interactions with others
Article
Schneider, Gudrun and Krüger, Konstanze
(2012)
Third-party interventions keep social partners from exchanging affiliative interactions with others.
Animal Behaviour 83, pp. 377-388.
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.36809
Abstract
Third-party interventions are defined as the interruption of dyadic interactions by third animals through direct physical contact, interposing or threats. Previous studies focused on the analysis of interventions against agonistic encounters. However, there have been no evaluations of interventions against affiliative behaviours, particularly in relation to the intervening animal's social ...
Third-party interventions are defined as the interruption of dyadic interactions by third animals through direct physical contact, interposing or threats. Previous studies focused on the analysis of interventions against agonistic encounters. However, there have been no evaluations of interventions against affiliative behaviours, particularly in relation to the intervening animal's social relationships and its social and spatial position. Horses, Equus caballus, are an interesting model species, as interventions against affiliative interactions occur more frequently than against agonistic interactions. In this study, 64 feral horses displayed 67 interventions in affiliative interactions and eight interventions in agonistic interactions within the observation period. We analysed the interventions in affiliative encounters, and found that it was mainly higher-ranking females that intervened in the affiliative interactions of group mates in the stable horse harems. The intervening animals took an active part in affiliative and agonistic encounters within the group, but did not occupy particular social roles or spatial positions. They intervened in affiliative interactions in which group mates with which they had social bonds interacted with other members of the group. They targeted the nonbonded animal and approached the one with which they were socially bonded. We suggest some species use third-party interventions in affiliative interactions to prevent competition for preferred social interaction partners from escalating into more costly agonistic encounters. (C) 2011 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | Animal Behaviour | ||||
| Publisher | ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD | ||||
| Open Access Type | Due to SHERPA/RoMEO | ||||
| Place of Publication | LONDON | ||||
| Volume | 83 | ||||
| Page Range | pp. 377-388 | ||||
| Date | February 2012 | ||||
| Date of publication | 27 Feb 2018 07:43 | ||||
| Institutions | Biology, Preclinical Medicine > Institut für Zoologie | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Keywords | HORSES EQUUS-CABALLUS; FERAL HORSES; DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES; ANIMAL SOCIETIES; BEHAVIOR; HERD; PATTERNS; COOPERATION; AGGRESSION; EVOLUTION; Equus caballus; horse; rank; social bond; social network; third-party intervention | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 500 Science > 570 Life sciences 500 Science > 590 Zoological sciences | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| URN of the UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-368090 | ||||
| Item ID | 36809 |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics