Direkt zum Inhalt

Benditz, Achim ; Pulido, L. ; Renkawitz, T. ; Schwarz, T. ; Grifka, J. ; Weber, Markus

Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?

Article

Benditz, Achim , Pulido, L., Renkawitz, T., Schwarz, T., Grifka, J. and Weber, Markus (2018) Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web? BioMed Research International 2018, pp. 1-6.

DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.38185


Abstract

This study evaluates how medical students rate the different types of teaching materials and methods available as well as possible gender-specific differences in the use of such materials. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study a questionnaire with short, one-dimensional questions with a 4-step Likert scale was developed by a presurvey within 493 students (4th year) at a University Medical ...

This study evaluates how medical students rate the different types of teaching materials and methods available as well as possible gender-specific differences in the use of such materials. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study a questionnaire with short, one-dimensional questions with a 4-step Likert scale was developed by a presurvey within 493 students (4th year) at a University Medical School (January-December 2015). The anonymous survey was performed from July 2016 to February 2017 with 252 students within an orthopaedic surgery course at University Medical School. After exclusion of (1) nonnative speakers and (2) incomplete forms, 233 samples were included. Practical education was regarded as the most important (n=160/68.7%) teaching method followed by Internet research (n=147/63.1%) as the most important teaching material, while traditional frontal teaching (n=19/8.2%) and e-books (n=11/4.7%) ranked last. The evaluation of gender-specific differences in the use of teaching materials showed that female students prefer to highlight text (p<0.0001) as well as a trend to Internet research (p=0.053) and small-group teaching (p=0.057). Despite some gender-specific differences, traditional learning methods retain their importance besides new learning possibilities such as Internet research.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleBioMed Research International
PublisherHindawi
Open Access TypeGold (with APC)
Place of PublicationLONDON
Volume2018
Page Rangepp. 1-6
Date6 December 2018
Date of publication14 Jan 2019 10:28
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1155/2018/3196869DOI
KeywordsLEARNING STYLE PREFERENCES; ACHIEVEMENT;
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgYes
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-381854
Item ID38185

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben