Direkt zum Inhalt

Loss, Julika ; Müller, Daniel ; Weigl, Johannes ; Helbig, Horst ; Brandl, Caroline ; Heid, Iris M. ; Finger, Robert P. ; Weber, Bernhard H. F. ; Curbach, Janina

Views of ophthalmologists on the genetics of age-related macular degeneration: Results of a qualitative study

Loss, Julika , Müller, Daniel, Weigl, Johannes, Helbig, Horst, Brandl, Caroline , Heid, Iris M., Finger, Robert P., Weber, Bernhard H. F. und Curbach, Janina (2018) Views of ophthalmologists on the genetics of age-related macular degeneration: Results of a qualitative study. PLOS ONE 13 (12), e0209328.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 24 Jan 2019 13:53
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.38267


Zusammenfassung

Background Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in industrialized countries. It is a multifactorial disease of the retina modified by environmental/individual (e.g. smoking) and genetic factors. 34 independent genomic loci are associated with the risk to develop AMD; an interaction between smoking and genetics is currently investigated. It is unclear how the ...

Background Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in industrialized countries. It is a multifactorial disease of the retina modified by environmental/individual (e.g. smoking) and genetic factors. 34 independent genomic loci are associated with the risk to develop AMD; an interaction between smoking and genetics is currently investigated. It is unclear how the knowledge on the strong genetic component has entered the knowledge base of practicing ophthalmologists, and how they inform and counsel their (AMD) patients about it. In this study, we explore the ophthalmologist's view on AMD genetics, and their inclination towards communicating genetic risks to patients. Methods We recruited a purposive sample of thirty German ophthalmologists (office based: n = 15, hospital employees: n = 15, f:8/30), who took part in a recorded semi-standardized interview. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. Results The majority of office-based ophthalmologists claimed to be unfamiliar with genetics of AMD, in contrast to hospital-affiliated ophthalmologists. Both office and hospital ophthalmologists were convinced that genetics lacks practical relevance in everyday patient care. Many withhold information on heritability or genetic background of AMD from patients and their relatives, for fear of unsettling those individuals. The relevance of the genetic component of AMD or an individual's high genetic risk for prevention, e.g. screening or lifestyle modifications in persons with adverse genetic profile, was rated low. Conclusion Developing genetic educational programs tailored to the routine care of ophthalmologists may be indicated, as well as a better two-way communication between research and practice. Exploring patient views about their expectations to being informed about genetic disease etiology, or about their individual risk, would help inform communication strategies.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftPLOS ONE
Verlag:PLOS
Ort der Veröffentlichung:SAN FRANCISCO
Band:13
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:12
Seitenbereich:e0209328
Datum20 Dezember 2018
InstitutionenMedizin > Institut für Epidemiologie und Präventivmedizin > Medizinische Soziologie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1371/journal.pone.0209328DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsHEALTH-CARE; PREVALENCE; KNOWLEDGE; SUSCEPTIBILITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ACCELERATE; ATTITUDES; EDUCATION; SMOKING; US;
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-382677
Dokumenten-ID38267

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben