Direkt zum Inhalt

Budweiser, Stephan ; Baur, Tobias ; Jörres, Rudolf A. ; Kollert, F. ; Pfeifer, Michael ; Heinemann, F.

Predictors of Successful Decannulation Using a Tracheostomy Retainer in Patients with Prolonged Weaning and Persisting Respiratory Failure

Budweiser, Stephan, Baur, Tobias, Jörres, Rudolf A., Kollert, F., Pfeifer, Michael and Heinemann, F. (2012) Predictors of Successful Decannulation Using a Tracheostomy Retainer in Patients with Prolonged Weaning and Persisting Respiratory Failure. Respiration 84, pp. 469-476.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 23 Oct 2019 09:38
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.40890


Abstract

Background: For percutaneously tracheostomized patients with prolonged weaning and persisting respiratory failure, the adequate time point for safe decannulation and switch to noninvasive ventilation is an important clinical issue. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a tracheostomy retainer (TR) and the predictors of successful decannulation. Methods: We studied 166 of 384 patients ...

Background: For percutaneously tracheostomized patients with prolonged weaning and persisting respiratory failure, the adequate time point for safe decannulation and switch to noninvasive ventilation is an important clinical issue. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a tracheostomy retainer (TR) and the predictors of successful decannulation. Methods: We studied 166 of 384 patients with prolonged weaning in whom a TR was inserted into a tracheostoma. Patients were analyzed with regard to successful decannulation and characterized by blood gas values, the duration of previous spontaneous breathing, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) and laboratory parameters. Results: In 47 patients (28.3%) recannulation was necessary, mostly due to respiratory decompensation and aspiration. Overall, 80.6% of the patients could be liberated from a tracheostomy with the help of a TR. The need for recannulation was associated with a shorter duration of spontaneous breathing within the last 24/48 h (p < 0.01 each), lower arterial oxygen tension (p = 0.025), greater age (p = 0.025), and a higher creatinine level (p = 0.003) and SAPS (p < 0.001). The risk for recannulation was 9.5% when patients breathed spontaneously for 19-24 h within the 24 h prior to decannulation, but 75.0% when patients breathed for only 0-6 h without ventilatory support (p < 0.001). According to ROC analysis, the SAPS best predicted successful decannulation [AUC 0.725 (95% CI: 0.634-0.815), p < 0.001]. Recannulated patients had longer durations of intubation (p = 0.046), tracheostomy (p = 0.003) and hospital stay (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In percutaneously tracheostomized patients with prolonged weaning, the use of a TR seems to facilitate and improve the weaning process considerably. The duration of spontaneous breathing prior to decannulation, age and oxygenation describe the risk for recannulation in these patients. Copyright (c) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleRespiration
Publisher:KARGER
Place of Publication:BASEL
Volume:84
Page Range:pp. 469-476
Date2012
Additional Information (public)OA-Komponente aus Allianzlizenz
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin II
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1159/000335740DOI
KeywordsMECHANICAL VENTILATION; DETERMINANTS; Prolonged weaning; Chronic respiratory failure; Tracheostomy; Noninvasive ventilation
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgYes
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-408901
Item ID40890

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben