Abstract
Purpose: To study implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients with focus on implant survival and quality of life. Materials and methods: The prospective observational study presents preliminary results of 29 edentulous head neck cancer patients (20 patients after radiotherapy) with 165 OsseoSpeed implants. Implant success after 1-year follow-up was evaluated by means ...
Abstract
Purpose: To study implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients with focus on implant survival and quality of life. Materials and methods: The prospective observational study presents preliminary results of 29 edentulous head neck cancer patients (20 patients after radiotherapy) with 165 OsseoSpeed implants. Implant success after 1-year follow-up was evaluated by means of the Albrektsson criteria. Quality of life was analysed with the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35, and OHIP 14 questionnaires. Results: The overall implant survival rate after 1 year was 95.2% (157/165). Implant success measured by the Albrektsson criteria showed a lower success rate of 86.7% (143/165), mainly because of peri-implant marginal bone loss with a mean of 0.8 mm after 1 year. Xerostomia (p = 0.008), implant insertion within the radiation target volume (p = 0.09), implantation in transplanted bone (p = 0.05), and smoking (p = 0.041) were the main reasons for implant failure, followed by D4 bone quality, maxillary implant site, and insufficient primary stability. Speaking, swallowing, eating, as well as social integration and individual self-confidence had considerably improved 1 year after denture placement compared to before treatment. Conclusion: Implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients is possible at a calculable risk and significantly improves patients' quality of life. (C) 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.