Direkt zum Inhalt

Brandstetter, Susanne ; Rothfuß, David ; Seelbach-Göbel, Birgit ; Melter, Michael ; Kabesch, Michael ; Apfelbacher, Christian J.

Information on, knowledge and utilisation of support services during pregnancy and after childbirth: cross-sectional analyses of predictors using data from the KUNO-Kids health study

Article

Brandstetter, Susanne , Rothfuß, David, Seelbach-Göbel, Birgit, Melter, Michael, Kabesch, Michael and Apfelbacher, Christian J. (2020) Information on, knowledge and utilisation of support services during pregnancy and after childbirth: cross-sectional analyses of predictors using data from the KUNO-Kids health study. BMJ Open 10 (10), e037745.

DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.44083


Abstract

Objectives To investigate mothers' knowledge and utilisation of antenatal and perinatal support services as well as predictors of knowledge and service utilisation. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Prospective birth cohort in Regensburg, Eastern Bavaria, Germany. Participants 2455 mothers after delivery. Outcome measures Participants' knowledge of distinct antenatal and perinatal support ...

Objectives To investigate mothers' knowledge and utilisation of antenatal and perinatal support services as well as predictors of knowledge and service utilisation. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Prospective birth cohort in Regensburg, Eastern Bavaria, Germany. Participants 2455 mothers after delivery. Outcome measures Participants' knowledge of distinct antenatal and perinatal support services (poor vs good, defined by median split). Participants' use of antenatal services provided by midwife (yes, no) and of any other antenatal support services (yes, no). Results The vast majority of mothers knew at least some support services. Two-thirds of women (68.4%) reported to have used the services provided by midwives. 23.6% of women reported to have used at least one of the other antenatal services. Good knowledge of services was associated with higher education (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.67), no migration background (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.76 to 2.90), better health literacy (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06), while being primiparous (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.86) and being unmarried/living with a partner (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89) reduced the chance. Predictors of service utilisation differed with regard to the services considered. Conclusions Overall, mothers had a good level of knowledge of antenatal and perinatal support services. However, we found that some groups of women were less well informed. This inequality in social predictors of knowledge of services was also partly reflected in differences in service utilisation during pregnancy.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleBMJ Open
PublisherBMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Open Access TypeGold (with APC)
Place of PublicationLONDON
Volume10
Number of Issue or Book Chapter10
Page Rangee037745
Date26 October 2020
Date of publication13 Jan 2021 10:46
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe (Schwerpunkt Geburtshilfe)
Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037745DOI
KeywordsCARE; WELL; MATERNITY; START; epidemiology; maternal medicine; community child health; public health
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgYes
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-440839
Item ID44083

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben