| Item type: | Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal or Publication Title: | PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie | ||||
| Publisher: | GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG | ||||
| Place of Publication: | STUTTGART | ||||
| Volume: | 70 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 07 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 300-307 | ||||
| Date: | 2020 | ||||
| Institutions: | Medicine > Abteilung für Psychosomatische Medizin | ||||
| Identification Number: |
| ||||
| Keywords: | TENSION-TYPE HEADACHE; HEALTH-CARE; MIGRAINE; EFFICACY; PREVALENCE; BURDEN; headache; migraine; non-pharmacologic treatment; outpatient care system; biofeedback | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||
| Status: | Published | ||||
| Refereed: | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg: | Yes | ||||
| Item ID: | 49893 |
Web of ScienceAbstract
BackgroundBiofeedback-treatment for primary headache is highly recommended. Its expenses are mostly not or not completely covered by health funds, hindering the implementation in the care system. This randomized controlled study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a biofeedback-treatment for primary headache in the outpatient care system all over Germany. MethodsThe participants were divided into ...
Abstract
BackgroundBiofeedback-treatment for primary headache is highly recommended. Its expenses are mostly not or not completely covered by health funds, hindering the implementation in the care system. This randomized controlled study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a biofeedback-treatment for primary headache in the outpatient care system all over Germany. MethodsThe participants were divided into a direct treatment-group (n=41) and a waiting control-group (n=29). The treatment was carried out for 8-11 sessions with vasoconstriction-/vasodilation training for migraine, with electromyography training for headache of the tension type (diagnosis according to the criteria of the International Headache Association). Headache characteristics (frequency, duration, intensity) were collected via headache-diary before, during and after the treatment and headache specific disability using the Pain Disability Index before and after the treatment. The waiting group stated additional information of the questionnaires about 3 months before and again ultimately before the start of the treatment. Measurement of the headache specific self-efficacy (Headache Management Self-efficacy Scale) took place every second session. For the collected parameters the effect sizes f(2)or r were computed before in comparison to after the treatment and comparing the treatment-group to the waiting-group. ResultsHeadache characteristics decreased during the time of the study significantly linearly with medium to strong effects (frequency f(2)=0.302, p<0.001, duration f(2)=0.186, p<0.001, mean intensity f(2)=0.502, p<0.001, maximal intensity f(2)=0.546, p<0.001). Using biofeedback the self-efficacy rose significantly (p<0.001, r=0.782), even compared to the waiting time (p<0.001, r=0.604). Additionally the handling of pain, the psychological disability and the disability in everyday life improved significantly. Discussion and ConclusionOverall the effects were comparable to already existing studies. Therefore biofeedback turned out to be efficient against migraine and tension-type headache in the out-patient care setting. By that a better integration in the care system seems to be qualified.
Metadata last modified: 11 Oct 2021 12:46
Altmetric