Direkt zum Inhalt

Corbacioglu, Selim ; Topaloglu, Ozlem ; Aggarwal, Saurabh

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies of Defibrotide Prophylaxis for Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome

Corbacioglu, Selim , Topaloglu, Ozlem and Aggarwal, Saurabh (2022) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies of Defibrotide Prophylaxis for Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome. Clinical Drug Investigation.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 25 May 2022 04:38
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.52314


Abstract

Background and Objectives Defibrotide is approved to treat severe veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) after haematopoietic cell transplantation in patients aged > 1 month in the European Union and for VOD/SOS with renal/pulmonary dysfunction post-haematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States. This meta-analysis estimated the incidence and risk of VOD/SOS ...

Background and Objectives
Defibrotide is approved to treat severe veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) after haematopoietic cell transplantation in patients aged > 1 month in the European Union and for VOD/SOS with renal/pulmonary dysfunction post-haematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States. This meta-analysis estimated the incidence and risk of VOD/SOS after intravenous defibrotide prophylaxis using the published literature.
Methods
PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched through 30 November 2021 for defibrotide studies in VOD/SOS “prevention” or “prophylaxis,” excluding phase I studies, case reports, studies with fewer than ten patients and reviews.
Results
The search identified 733 records; 24 met inclusion criteria, of which 20 (N = 3005) evaluated intravenous defibrotide for VOD/SOS prophylaxis. Overall VOD/SOS incidence with intravenous defibrotide was 5%, with incidences of 5% in adults and 8% in paediatric patients. In eight studies with data on intravenous defibrotide prophylaxis vs controls (e.g. heparin, no prophylaxis), VOD/SOS incidence in controls was 16%. The risk ratio for developing VOD/SOS with defibrotide prophylaxis vs controls was 0.30 (95% confidence interval 0.12–0.71; p = 0.006).
Conclusions
This analysis suggests a low incidence of VOD/SOS following intravenous defibrotide prophylaxis, regardless of age group, and a lower relative risk for VOD/SOS with defibrotide prophylaxis vs controls in patient populations at high risk of VOD/SOS.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleClinical Drug Investigation
Publisher:Springer
Date20 May 2022
InstitutionsMedicine > Abteilung für Pädiatrische Hämatologie, Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1007/s40261-022-01140-yDOI
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgPartially
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-523146
Item ID52314

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben