Motivation
Surfactants like C8E8CH2COOH have such bulky headgroups that they cannot show the common sphere-to-cylinder transition, while surfactants like C18:1E2CH2COOH are mimicking lipids and form only bilayers. Mixing these two types of surfactants allows one to investigate the competition between intramicellar segregation leading to disc-like bicelles and the temperature dependent curvature constraints imposed by the mismatch between heads and tails.
Experiments
We establish phase diagrams as a function of temperature, surfactant mole ratio, and active matter content. We locate the isotropic liquid-isotropic liquid phase separation common to all nonionic surfactant systems, as well as nematic and lamellar phases. The stability and rheology of the nematic phase is investigated. Texture determination by polarizing microscopy allows us to distinguish between the different phases. Finally, SANS and SAXS give intermicellar distances as well as micellar sizes and shapes present for different compositions in the phase diagrams.
Findings
In a defined mole ratio between the two components, intramicellar segregation wins and a viscoelastic discotic nematic phase is present at low temperature. Partial intramicellar mixing upon heating leads to disc growth and eventually to a pseudo-lamellar phase. Further heating leads to complete random mixing and an isotropic phase, showing the common liquid–liquid miscibility gap. This uncommon phase sequence, bicelles, lamellar phase, micelles, and water-poor packed micelles, is due to temperature induced mixing combined with dehydration of the headgroups. This general molecular mechanism explains also why a metastable water-poor lamellar phase quenched by cooling can be easily and reproducibly transformed into a nematic phase by gentle hand shaking at room temperature, as well as the entrapment of air bubbles of any size without encapsulation by bilayers or polymers.