| Item type: | Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal or Publication Title: | Translational Oncology | ||||
| Publisher: | Elsevier | ||||
| Place of Publication: | NEW YORK | ||||
| Volume: | 15 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 1 | ||||
| Page Range: | p. 101279 | ||||
| Date: | 2022 | ||||
| Institutions: | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für experimentelle Medizin und Therapieverfahren | ||||
| Identification Number: |
| ||||
| Keywords: | PHASE-III; DNA; GEFITINIB; PREDICTORS; BIOPSIES; Lung cancer; ddPCR; NGS; cfDNA methylation; Surveillance | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||
| Status: | Published | ||||
| Refereed: | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg: | Yes | ||||
| Item ID: | 57637 |

Abstract
Background: Radiology is the current standard for monitoringtreatment responses in lung cancer. Limited sensitivity, exposure to ionizing radiations and related sequelae constitute some of its major limitation. Noninvasive and highly sensitive methods for early detection of treatment failures and resistance-associated disease progression would have additional clinical utility. Methods: We ...

Abstract
Background: Radiology is the current standard for monitoringtreatment responses in lung cancer. Limited sensitivity, exposure to ionizing radiations and related sequelae constitute some of its major limitation. Noninvasive and highly sensitive methods for early detection of treatment failures and resistance-associated disease progression would have additional clinical utility. Methods: We analyzed serially collected plasma and paired tumor samples from lung cancer patients (61 with stage IV, 48 with stages I-III disease) and 61 healthy samples by means of next-generation sequencing, radiological imaging and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) mutation and methylation assays. Results: A 62% variant concordance between tumor-reported and circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing was observedbetween baseline liquid and tissue biopsies in stage IV patients. Interestingly, ctDNA sequencing allowed for the identification of resistance-mediating p.T790M mutations in baseline plasma samples for which no such mutation was observed in the corresponding tissue. Serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutation analysis by means of ddPCR revealed a general decrease in ctDNA loads between baseline and first reassessment. Additionally, serial ctDNA analyses only recapitulated computed tomography (CT)-monitored tumor dynamics of some, but not all lesions within the same patient. To complement ctDNA variant analysis we devised a ctDNA methylation assay ((meth)cfDNA) based on methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes. cfDNA methylation showed and area under the curve (AUC) of > 0.90 in early and late stage cases. A decrease in (meth)cfDNA between baseline and first reassessment was reflected by a decrease in CT-derive tumor surface area, irrespective of tumor mutational status. Conclusion: Taken together, our data support the use of cfDNA sequencing for unbiased characterization of the molecular tumor architecture, highlights the impact of tumor architectural heterogeneity on ctDNA-based tumor surveillance and the added value of complementary approaches such as cfDNA methylation for early detection and monitoring
Metadata last modified: 29 Feb 2024 13:01

Altmetric