Background
Surfaces in close proximity to patients within hospitals may cause healthcare-associated infections. These surfaces are repositories for pathogens facilitating their transmission among staff and patients. Regular cleaning and disinfection of these surfaces provides only a temporary elimination of pathogens with inevitable recontamination. Antimicrobial coatings (AMCs) of such surfaces may additionally reduce the risk of pathogen transmissions.
Aim
To evaluate the efficacy of a standard and a novel photodynamic AMC, even at very low light intensities, in a field study conducted in two ICUs at our university hospital.
Methods
The microbial burden was determined on three coatings: standard photodynamic AMC (A), a novel photodynamic AMC (B), and an inactive AMC as control (C). The control coating C was identical to standard coating A, but it contained no photosensitizer. During a three-month period, 699 samples were collected from identical surfaces using eSwab and were analysed (cfu/cm2).
Findings
Mean values of all surfaces covered with control coating (C) showed a microbial burden of 5.5 ± 14.8 cfu/cm2. Photodynamic AMC showed significantly lower mean value of 1.6 ± 4.6 cfu/cm2 (coating A; P < 0.001) and 2.7 ± 9.6 (coating B; P < 0.001). When considering a benchmark of 2.5 cfu/cm2, the relative risk for higher microbial counts was reduced by 52% (coating A) or 40% (coating B), respectively.
Conclusion
Both photodynamic AMCs offer a substantial, permanent risk reduction of microbial counts on near-patient surfaces in ICUs with low light intensities.