Direkt zum Inhalt

Paddenberg-Schubert, Eva ; Midlej, Kareem ; Krohn, Sebastian ; Kuchler, Erika ; Watted, Nezar ; Proff, Peter ; Iraqi, Fuad A.

Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients

Article

Paddenberg-Schubert, Eva, Midlej, Kareem, Krohn, Sebastian, Kuchler, Erika, Watted, Nezar, Proff, Peter and Iraqi, Fuad A. (2025) Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients. Clinical Oral Investigations 29, p. 396.

DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.77516


Abstract

Objectives: Precisely diagnosing skeletal class is mandatory for correct orthodontic treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase efficiency during diagnostics and contribute to automated workflows. So far, no AI-driven process can differentiate between skeletal classes I, II, and III in German orthodontic patients. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to develop machine- and ...

Objectives:
Precisely diagnosing skeletal class is mandatory for correct orthodontic treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase efficiency during diagnostics and contribute to automated workflows. So far, no AI-driven process can differentiate between skeletal classes I, II, and III in German orthodontic patients. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to develop machine- and deep-learning models for diagnosing their skeletal class based on the gold-standard individualised ANB of Panagiotidis and Witt.

Materials and methods:
Orthodontic patients treated in Germany contributed to the study population. Pre-treatment cephalometric parameters, sex, and age served as input variables. Machine-learning models performed were linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naïve Bayes (NB), and multi class logistic regression (MCLR). Furthermore, an artificial neural network (ANN) was conducted.

Results:
1277 German patients presented skeletal class I (48.79%), II (27.56%) and III (23.64%). The best machine-learning model, which considered all input parameters, was RF with 100% accuracy, with Calculated_ANB being the most important (0.429). The model with Calculated_ANB only achieved 100% accuracy (KNN), but ANB alone was inappropriate (71–76% accuracy). The ANN with all parameters and Calculated_ANB achieved 95.31% and 100% validation-accuracy, respectively.

Conclusions:
Machine- and deep-learning methods can correctly determine an individual’s skeletal class. Calculated_ANB was the most important among all input parameters, which, therefore, requires precise determination.

Clinical relevance:
The AI methods introduced may help to establish digital and automated workflows in cephalometric diagnostics, which could contribute to the relief of the orthodontic practitioner.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleClinical Oral Investigations
PublisherSpringer Nature Link
Open Access TypeDEAL (Springer)
Volume29
Page Rangep. 396
Date5 August 2025
Date of publication06 Aug 2025 08:15
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Kieferorthopädie
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1007/s00784-025-06485-0DOI
KeywordsSkeletal malocclusion · Artificial intelligence · Orthodontic diagnostics · Cephalometric analysis ·Individualized ANB · Orthodontic treatment planning
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgPartially
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-775162
Item ID77516

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben