Direkt zum Inhalt

Barrett, John W. ; Garcke, Harald ; Nürnberg, Robert

Phase Field Models Versus Parametric Front Tracking Methods: Are They Accurate and Computationally Efficient?

Artikel

Barrett, John W., Garcke, Harald und Nürnberg, Robert (2014) Phase Field Models Versus Parametric Front Tracking Methods: Are They Accurate and Computationally Efficient? Communications in Computational Physics (CiCP) 15, S. 506-555.

DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.34614


Zusammenfassung

We critically compare the practicality and accuracy of numerical approximations of phase field models and sharp interface models of solidification. Here we focus on Stefan problems, and their quasi-static variants, with applications to crystal growth. New approaches with a high mesh quality for the parametric approximations of the resulting free boundary problems and new stable discretizations of ...

We critically compare the practicality and accuracy of numerical approximations of phase field models and sharp interface models of solidification. Here we focus on Stefan problems, and their quasi-static variants, with applications to crystal growth. New approaches with a high mesh quality for the parametric approximations of the resulting free boundary problems and new stable discretizations of the anisotropic phase field system are taken into account in a comparison involving benchmark problems based on exact solutions of the free boundary problem.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftCommunications in Computational Physics (CiCP)
VerlagGLOBAL SCIENCE PRESS
Open Access ArtAllianz-/Nationallizenz
Ort der VeröffentlichungWANCHAI
Band15
SeitenbereichS. 506-555
Datum2014
Veröffentlichungsdatum30 Sep 2016 08:27
InstitutionenMathematik > Prof. Dr. Harald Garcke
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.4208/cicp.190313.010813aDOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsGEOMETRIC EVOLUTION-EQUATIONS; FINITE-ELEMENT APPROXIMATION; CAHN-HILLIARD EQUATION; MULLINS-SEKERKA PROBLEM; SHARP INTERFACE LIMITS; CRYSTAL-GROWTH; DENDRITIC SOLIDIFICATION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; PARABOLIC EQUATIONS; 3 DIMENSIONS; Phase field models; parametric sharp interface methods; Stefan problem; anisotropy; solidification; crystal growth; numerical simulations; benchmark problems
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 510 Mathematik
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-346145
Dokumenten-ID34614

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben