Go to content
UR Home

Praxeological Enactivism vs. Radical Enactivism: Reply to Hutto

URN to cite this document:
DOI to cite this document:
Weichold, Martin ; Rucińska, Zuzanna
[img]License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
PDF - Published Version
Date of publication of this fulltext: 25 Aug 2022 04:11

This publication is part of the DEAL contract with Springer.


In his recent paper “Getting Real About Pretense: A Radical Enactivist Proposal”, Daniel Hutto raises several objections against our so-called praxeological enactivist account of pretense (Weichold & Rucińska 2022). He argues that one should, instead, adopt his radical enactivist explanation of pretend play. In this short reply, we defend our praxeological enactivist account against his objections, and argue that it has crucial advantages over his radical enactivist alternative.

Owner only: item control page
  1. Homepage UR

University Library

Publication Server


Publishing: oa@ur.de
0941 943 -4239 or -69394

Dissertations: dissertationen@ur.de
0941 943 -3904

Research data: datahub@ur.de
0941 943 -5707

Contact persons