Direkt zum Inhalt

Schiltz, Daniel ; Eibl, Dominik ; Mueller, Karolina ; Biermann, Niklas ; Prantl, Lukas ; Taeger, Christian Dirk

Therapist versus Machine—Immediate Effects of Manual versus Mechanical Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Secondary Lymphedema

Schiltz, Daniel , Eibl, Dominik, Mueller, Karolina, Biermann, Niklas, Prantl, Lukas and Taeger, Christian Dirk (2024) Therapist versus Machine—Immediate Effects of Manual versus Mechanical Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Secondary Lymphedema. Journal of Clinical Medicine 13 (5), p. 1277.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 12 Mar 2024 09:45
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.57892


Abstract

Background: Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) is the standard and basic therapy for lymphedema. The central component of CDT is manual lymphatic drainage (MLD). In addition to CDT, other measures such as intermittent pneumatic compression therapy (IPCT) (active compression machine therapy) are available. In this prospective research study, the objective and subjective effects of MLD and IPCT on ...

Background: Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) is the standard and basic therapy for lymphedema. The central component of CDT is manual lymphatic drainage (MLD). In addition to CDT, other measures such as intermittent pneumatic compression therapy (IPCT) (active compression machine therapy) are available. In this prospective research study, the objective and subjective effects of MLD and IPCT on lymphedema of the lower extremity were investigated and both therapies were directly compared. Furthermore, the patients’ body mass index (BMI) and stage of lymphedema were tested for their effect on the respective therapy. Methods: Patients participating in the study received both therapies (MLD and IPCT) on the same lymphedema-affected limb at an interval of two days. The objective volumetric therapy effect was measured by the digital volume measurement of the affected limb. The subjective effects of the therapies were measured using two specially designed questionnaires. Results: A total of 40 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the volume differences between the interventions, BMI categories, lymphedema, or treatment order regarding the immediate and two-day effect. Conclusions: No significant difference was found in the subjective or objective therapy efficacy of the two methods. Intermittent pneumatic compression therapy is considered a comparable therapeutic procedure when properly indicated.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleJournal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher:MDPI
Volume:13
Number of Issue or Book Chapter:5
Page Range:p. 1277
Date23 February 2024
InstitutionsMedicine > Zentren des Universitätsklinikums Regensburg > Zentrum für Plastische-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie
Identification Number
ValueType
10.3390/jcm13051277DOI
Keywordslymphatic drainage; intermittent pneumatic compression; manual lymphatic drainage; lymphedema; lipedema
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgYes
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-578922
Item ID57892

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben