Direkt zum Inhalt

Kerkel, Katharina ; Schoisswohl, Stefan ; Steinecker, Lea ; Engelke, Milena ; Abdelnaim, Mohamed A. ; Langguth, Berthold ; Reissmann, Andreas

The antidepressant effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation is not impacted by comorbid neurotic, stress-related or somatoform disorders

Artikel

Kerkel, Katharina, Schoisswohl, Stefan , Steinecker, Lea, Engelke, Milena , Abdelnaim, Mohamed A. , Langguth, Berthold und Reissmann, Andreas (2026) The antidepressant effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation is not impacted by comorbid neurotic, stress-related or somatoform disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders 403, S. 121479.

DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.78832


Zusammenfassung

Introduction: Depression is frequently accompanied by neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (F4 diagnoses, ICD-10), which are linked to greater severity and poorer treatment outcomes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used for treatment-resistant depression. We investigated whether comorbid F4 diagnoses affect the antidepressant ...

Introduction:
Depression is frequently accompanied by neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (F4 diagnoses, ICD-10), which are linked to greater severity and poorer treatment outcomes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used for treatment-resistant depression. We investigated whether comorbid F4 diagnoses affect the antidepressant efficacy of different TMS protocols under real-world conditions.

Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed data from 416 in- and outpatients with unipolar or bipolar depression at a German tertiary hospital between 2019 and 2024, of whom 107 had an F4 comorbidity. All patients received left prefrontal TMS: intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) with 600 (n = 138), 1200 (n = 98), or 1800 pulses per session (n = 104), or tonic repetitive TMS (rTMS) at 20 Hz with 2000 pulses (n = 76). Depressive symptoms were assessed before and after treatment using the HAMD-21 and MDI.

Results:
Depression scores improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between patients with or without F4-comorbidity. Remission rates were lower in patients with comorbid F4-diagnoses. No significant differences were observed between TMS protocols in patients with F4-comorbidity. Network analyses revealed similar symptom profiles in both groups.

Conclusion:
Comorbid F4-diagnoses do not affect the antidepressant efficacy of TMS. iTBS is as effective as other protocols, but shorter and more cost-efficient, making it preferable for patients and providers.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftJournal of Affective Disorders
VerlagElsevier
Open Access ArtDEAL (Elsevier)
Band403
SeitenbereichS. 121479
Datum21 Februar 2026
Veröffentlichungsdatum03 Mrz 2026 05:30
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1016/j.jad.2026.121479DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsComorbid neurotic, stress-related, and somatoform, disorder (ICD-10: F4), Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, (rTMS)
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-788321
Dokumenten-ID78832

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben