Direkt zum Inhalt

Owner only: item control page
Kerkel, Katharina ; Schoisswohl, Stefan ; Steinecker, Lea ; Engelke, Milena ; Abdelnaim, Mohamed A. ; Langguth, Berthold ; Reissmann, Andreas

The antidepressant effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation is not impacted by comorbid neurotic, stress-related or somatoform disorders

Kerkel, Katharina, Schoisswohl, Stefan , Steinecker, Lea, Engelke, Milena , Abdelnaim, Mohamed A. , Langguth, Berthold and Reissmann, Andreas (2026) The antidepressant effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation is not impacted by comorbid neurotic, stress-related or somatoform disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders 403, p. 121479.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 03 Mar 2026 05:30
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.78832


Abstract

Introduction: Depression is frequently accompanied by neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (F4 diagnoses, ICD-10), which are linked to greater severity and poorer treatment outcomes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used for treatment-resistant depression. We investigated whether comorbid F4 diagnoses affect the antidepressant ...

Introduction:
Depression is frequently accompanied by neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (F4 diagnoses, ICD-10), which are linked to greater severity and poorer treatment outcomes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used for treatment-resistant depression. We investigated whether comorbid F4 diagnoses affect the antidepressant efficacy of different TMS protocols under real-world conditions.

Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed data from 416 in- and outpatients with unipolar or bipolar depression at a German tertiary hospital between 2019 and 2024, of whom 107 had an F4 comorbidity. All patients received left prefrontal TMS: intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) with 600 (n = 138), 1200 (n = 98), or 1800 pulses per session (n = 104), or tonic repetitive TMS (rTMS) at 20 Hz with 2000 pulses (n = 76). Depressive symptoms were assessed before and after treatment using the HAMD-21 and MDI.

Results:
Depression scores improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between patients with or without F4-comorbidity. Remission rates were lower in patients with comorbid F4-diagnoses. No significant differences were observed between TMS protocols in patients with F4-comorbidity. Network analyses revealed similar symptom profiles in both groups.

Conclusion:
Comorbid F4-diagnoses do not affect the antidepressant efficacy of TMS. iTBS is as effective as other protocols, but shorter and more cost-efficient, making it preferable for patients and providers.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleJournal of Affective Disorders
Publisher:Elsevier
Open Access Type:DEAL (Elsevier)
Volume:403
Page Range:p. 121479
Date21 February 2026
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1016/j.jad.2026.121479DOI
KeywordsComorbid neurotic, stress-related, and somatoform, disorder (ICD-10: F4), Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, (rTMS)
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgYes
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-788321
Item ID78832

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben