| Published Version Download ( PDF | 2MB) | License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
The antidepressant effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation is not impacted by comorbid neurotic, stress-related or somatoform disorders
Kerkel, Katharina, Schoisswohl, Stefan
, Steinecker, Lea, Engelke, Milena
, Abdelnaim, Mohamed A.
, Langguth, Berthold
and Reissmann, Andreas
(2026)
The antidepressant effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation is not impacted by comorbid neurotic, stress-related or somatoform disorders.
Journal of Affective Disorders 403, p. 121479.
Date of publication of this fulltext: 03 Mar 2026 05:30
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.78832
Abstract
Introduction: Depression is frequently accompanied by neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (F4 diagnoses, ICD-10), which are linked to greater severity and poorer treatment outcomes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used for treatment-resistant depression. We investigated whether comorbid F4 diagnoses affect the antidepressant ...
Introduction:
Depression is frequently accompanied by neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (F4 diagnoses, ICD-10), which are linked to greater severity and poorer treatment outcomes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used for treatment-resistant depression. We investigated whether comorbid F4 diagnoses affect the antidepressant efficacy of different TMS protocols under real-world conditions.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed data from 416 in- and outpatients with unipolar or bipolar depression at a German tertiary hospital between 2019 and 2024, of whom 107 had an F4 comorbidity. All patients received left prefrontal TMS: intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) with 600 (n = 138), 1200 (n = 98), or 1800 pulses per session (n = 104), or tonic repetitive TMS (rTMS) at 20 Hz with 2000 pulses (n = 76). Depressive symptoms were assessed before and after treatment using the HAMD-21 and MDI.
Results:
Depression scores improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between patients with or without F4-comorbidity. Remission rates were lower in patients with comorbid F4-diagnoses. No significant differences were observed between TMS protocols in patients with F4-comorbidity. Network analyses revealed similar symptom profiles in both groups.
Conclusion:
Comorbid F4-diagnoses do not affect the antidepressant efficacy of TMS. iTBS is as effective as other protocols, but shorter and more cost-efficient, making it preferable for patients and providers.
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | Journal of Affective Disorders | ||||
| Publisher: | Elsevier | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Access Type: | DEAL (Elsevier) | ||||
| Volume: | 403 | ||||
| Page Range: | p. 121479 | ||||
| Date | 21 February 2026 | ||||
| Institutions | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Keywords | Comorbid neurotic, stress-related, and somatoform, disorder (ICD-10: F4), Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, (rTMS) | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| URN of the UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-788321 | ||||
| Item ID | 78832 |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics