Creation of journal-based publication profiles of scientific institutions — A methodology for the interdisciplinary comparison of scientific research based on the J-factor

URN to cite this document:

urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-108155 Copy

Ball, Rafael ; Mittermaier, Bernhard ; Tunger, Dirk

Preview

PDF (276kB)

Date of publication of this fulltext: 30 Oct 2009 07:53

---

Alternative links to fulltext:DOI

---

Details

Item type:	Article
Date:	18 March 2009
Institutions:	Central Institutions > University Library
Identification Number:	Value Type 10.1007/s11192-009-2120-5 DOI
Dewey Decimal Classification:	000 Computer science, information & general works > 020 Library & information sciences
Status:	Published
Refereed:	Yes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of Regensburg:	No
Item ID:	10815

Preview

Export bibliographical data

ASCII CitationAtomBibTeXData Cite XMLDataCite XML OAIDublin CoreEndNoteHTML CitationMETSMODSOpenAPCRDF+N-TriplesRDF+N3RDF+XMLReferReference ManagerSimple MetadataXMLxMetaDissPlus

---

Abstract

A form of normalisation is presented for the evaluation of citation data on multidisciplinary research. This method is based on the existing classification according to the publishing journals and not on the classification of output according to ISI subject categories. A publication profile is created for each institution to be investigated. This profile accounts for the weight of publications in ...

Abstract

A form of normalisation is presented for the evaluation of citation data on multidisciplinary research. This method is based on the existing classification according to the publishing journals and not on the classification of output according to ISI subject categories. A publication profile is created for each institution to be investigated. This profile accounts for the weight of publications in a journal, represented by the number of publications as a proportion of the total output of the institution. In accordance with this weight, the citation rate of each journal is compared to a qualified relative indicator. The final result is a relative citation rate J, which is the relative perception of the performance of an institution accounting for its publication and citation habits and makes a transdisciplinary comparison possible.

---

---

Metadata last modified: 03 Jun 2018 23:39

Owner only: item control page

Download Statistics

Download Statistics

Download Statistics

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Altmetric

Altmetric

Alternative Statistics (altmetrics)

More literature (via CORE)

More literature (via CORE)

More literature (via CORE)

More literature (via CORE)