Abstract
Reverse signaling of transmembrane TNF (mTNF) contributes to the versatility of this cytokine superfamily. Previously, we could demonstrate that mTNF acting as receptor confers resistance to bacterial lipopolysaccharide in monocytes and macrophages (MO/MPhi). Reverse signaling can be induced by incubation with the monoclonal anti-TNF antibody 195E and other TNF antagonists, such as the humanized ...
Abstract
Reverse signaling of transmembrane TNF (mTNF) contributes to the versatility of this cytokine superfamily. Previously, we could demonstrate that mTNF acting as receptor confers resistance to bacterial lipopolysaccharide in monocytes and macrophages (MO/MPhi). Reverse signaling can be induced by incubation with the monoclonal anti-TNF antibody 195E and other TNF antagonists, such as the humanized monoclonal antibody infliximab and the humanized soluble TNF receptor construct etanercept, respectively, all in former or present clinical use. Here, we addressed the question whether there are differences in modulating the LPS response in MO/MPhi among these three antagonists. Whereas 195E and infliximab suppress both, the release of an LPS-induced endothelial cell apoptotic factor and proinflammatory cytokines, etanercept only protected against the LPS-triggered apoptosis activity, but left the LPS-induced cytokine release unchanged. These data could have clinical impact with regard to TNF neutralization strategies. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Altmetric