Alternative links to fulltext:Pubmed
| Item type: | Article | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal or Publication Title: | The American journal of pathology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Publisher: | American Society for Investigative Pathology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Volume: | 154 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 83-95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date: | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Institutions: | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Pathologie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Identification Number: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Classification: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Status: | Published | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Refereed: | Unknown | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg: | Unknown | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Item ID: | 15353 |
Abstract
Combining whole genome amplification (WGA) methods with novel laser-based microdissection techniques has made it possible to exploit recent progress in molecular knowledge of cancer development and progression. However, WGA of one or a few cells has not yet been optimized and systematically evaluated for samples routinely processed in tumor pathology. We therefore studied the value of established ...
Abstract
Combining whole genome amplification (WGA) methods with novel laser-based microdissection techniques has made it possible to exploit recent progress in molecular knowledge of cancer development and progression. However, WGA of one or a few cells has not yet been optimized and systematically evaluated for samples routinely processed in tumor pathology. We therefore studied the value of established WGA protocols in comparison to an improved PEP (I-PEP) PCR method in defined numbers of flow-sorted and microdissected tumor cells obtained both from frozen as well as formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections. In addition, the feasibility of I-PEP-PCR for mutation analysis was tested using clusters of 50-100 unfixed tumor cells obtained by touch preparation of ten breast carcinomas by conventional sequencing of exon 7 and 8 of the p53 gene. Finally, immunocytochemically stained microdissected single disseminated tumor cells from bone marrow aspirates were investigated with respect to mutations in codon 12 of Ki-ras by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-PCR after I-PEP-PCR. The modified I-PEP-PCR protocol was superior to the original PEP-PCR and DOP-PCR protocols concerning amplification of DNA from one cell (efficiency rate I-PEP-PCR 40% versus PEP-PCR 15% and DOP-PCR 30%) and five cells (efficiency rate I-PEP-PCR 100% versus PEP-PCR 33% and DOP-PCR 20%). Preamplification by I-PEP allowed 100% sequence accuracy in > 4000 sequenced base pairs and Ki-ras mutation detection in isolated single disseminated tumor cells. For reliable microsatellite analysis of I-PEP-preamplified DNA, at least 10 unfixed cells from fluorescence-activated cell sorting, 10 cells from frozen tissue, or at least 30 cells from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections were required. Thus, I-PEP-PCR allowed multiple reliable microsatellite analyses suited for microsatellite instability and losses of heterozygosity and mutation analysis even at the single cell level, rendering this technique a powerful new tool for molecular analyses in diagnostic and experimental tumor pathology.
Metadata last modified: 24 May 2018 12:09
Owner only: item control page
Altmetric