The Sexually Dimorphic Jamming Avoidance Response in the Electric Fish Eigenmannia (Teleostei, Gymnotiformes)

URN to cite this document:: urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-21200
DOI to cite this document:: 10.5283/epub.2120

Kramer, Bernd

Preview

PDF
(1MB)

Date of publication of this fulltext: 05 Aug 2009 13:36

Alternative links to fulltext:Publisher

Details

Item type:	Article
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Experimental Biology
Volume:	130
Number of Issue or Book Chapter:	1
Page Range:	pp. 39-62
Date:	July 1987
Institutions:	Biology, Preclinical Medicine > Institut für Zoologie > Alumni or Retired > Verhaltensbiologie und Verhaltensphysiologie (Prof. Dr. Bernd Kramer)
Keywords:	jamming avoidance response; electric organ discharge; frequency difference; beat frequency; sexual dimorphism; Eigenmannia
Dewey Decimal Classification:	500 Science > 570 Life sciences 500 Science > 590 Zoological sciences
Status:	Published
Refereed:	Yes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of Regensburg:	Yes
Item ID:	2120

Preview

Export bibliographical data

Abstract

Abstract

Eigenmannia's jamming avoidance response (JAR) is a frequency change of its electric organ discharge (EOD) in response to an electric stimulus of similar frequency (small AF; AF = FFlgh — FStlm). It is assumed that the response to an undamped stimulus, AR = FRMponM. — FRMI, is stereotyped and non-habituating, and improves the fish's electrolocation performance in the presence of a jamming stimulus, such as the EOD of a nearby conspecific.
Adult females gravid with eggs (N = 3) gave good responses (frequency decrease of at least 3 Hz) to —AF (stimulus frequency higher than fish frequency), but no response or only weak responses (<0-5 Hz) to + AF (stimulus frequency lower than fish frequency). After 2-75 years, a sexually mature female still showed the same behaviour, whereas an immature female (see below) had changed its behaviour considerably on becoming sexually mature.
Large males (A^ = 4) did not give JARs to + AF, and no JARs or only weak ones to — AF (|AR| < 0-7 Hz). Increasing the stimulus intensity by +10 or +20 dB did not change this result. After 2-5 years, two large males were still found to be almost unresponsive. However, large males gave rapid frequency modulations ('short rises' and 'interruptions'), which have been described from threatening fish likely to attack, even at the weakest stimulus intensity.
One group of juveniles (Ar=4; probably females) gave only a weak increase in frequency (AR<09Hz) in response to +AF but a strong frequency decrease (|AR|>2Hz) in response to —AF. Another group of juveniles (Af=4; probably males) gave strongest responses (AR > 3 Hz) to AF = 0 Hz. In these juveniles, the 'equilibrium point' of no response was at AF=— 0-6 Hz to — 1 Hz instead of at AF = 0 Hz. They thus increased, rather than decreased, their EOD frequency even at small — AFs, which would have been more economical. A decrease in frequency was weaker than an increase. A significant frequency change could even be elicited by stimuli of AF = OHz that are phase-locked to the EOD.
The accuracy of assessment of AF, as determined in juvenile fish giving good + ARs and -ARs, was not better than ±0-3 Hz (at AF=-06Hz). The JAR showed strong habituation.

Owner only: item control page

Download Statistics

More literature (via CORE)

Details

Preview

Export bibliographical data

Abstract

Abstract

Download Statistics

Downloads

More literature (via CORE)

University Library