| PDF - Accepted Version Manuskript (112kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 1a (194kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 1b (125kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 1c (1MB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 1d (486kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 2a (699kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 2b (699kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 2c (699kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 2d (699kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 2e (699kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 2f (699kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 3a (699kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 3b (699kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 3c (699kB) | |
| Image (TIFF) Abb. 3d (699kB) | |
![[img]](https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) | PDF - Published Version Verlags-PDF (441kB) - Repository staff only |
- DOI to cite this document:
- 10.5283/epub.23400
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For several years three-dimensional treatment-planning systems have used pencil beam algorithms in the calculation of electron fields. Nowadays, exact Monte Carlo methods are commercially available, showing good correspondence to experimental results. Clinical examples are investigated to find differences in the dose distribution of treatment plans, which are calculated ...
Owner only: item control page
Download Statistics