| Download ( PDF | 363kB) |
Impact of age on early outcome after coronary bypass graft surgery using minimized versus conventional extracorporeal circulation
Article
Kolat, Philipp, Ried, Michael, Haneya, Assad, Philipp, Alois, Kobuch, Reinhard, Hirt, Stephan, Hilker, Michael, Schmid, Christof and Diez, Claudius (2014) Impact of age on early outcome after coronary bypass graft surgery using minimized versus conventional extracorporeal circulation. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 9 (143).DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.31750
Abstract
Background: Objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of age on comparative early outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with minimized (MECC) and conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC). Methods: A retrospective age-, gender- and operation-matched cohort analysis between January 2005 and December 2010 with a total of 2274 patients undergoing CABG with MECC (n ...
Background: Objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of age on comparative early outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with minimized (MECC) and conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC). Methods: A retrospective age-, gender- and operation-matched cohort analysis between January 2005 and December 2010 with a total of 2274 patients undergoing CABG with MECC (n = 1137; 50%) or CECC was performed. Patients were stratified into 4 groups according to age: < 59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and 80 years of age or older. Outcomes were compared within each age group. Patients with preoperative dialysis were excluded from analysis. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Results: Patients treated with CECC had a significantly higher mean logistic EuroSCORE (6.3% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001), a slightly lower rate of preoperative myocardial infarction (46% vs. 51%; p = 0.01) and a higher rate of impaired renal function (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2: 24% vs. 20%; p = 0.01) compared to MECC-patients. Left internal mammary artery was significantly used more often in MECC patients (93% vs. 86%; p < 0.001). Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic-cross clamping time were significantly lower in the MECC group (p < 0.001). Overall 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients treated with CECC (4.4% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.002). Within the different age groups mortality rates were not significantly different except for patients aged 60-69 years (4.5% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.03). Postoperative requirement of renal replacement therapy (4% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.01), respiratory insufficiency (9.9% vs. 6.6%; P = 0.004) and incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (3% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.003) were significantly increased in patients with CECC. Multivariate analysis identified age (p = 0.005; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08; OR 1.05) among other parameters as an independent risk factor, whereas conventional extracorporeal circulation itself did not present as an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. Conclusions: In this matched study sample early outcome was significantly better in patients with MECC compared to CECC, irrespective of age. Prior myocardial infarction estimated GFR < 60 mL and waiving the use of LIMA were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality, which were more present in the CECC group.
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery | ||||
| Publisher | BIOMED CENTRAL LTD | ||||
| Open Access Type | Gold (with APC) | ||||
| Place of Publication | LONDON | ||||
| Volume | 9 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter | 143 | ||||
| Date | 28 August 2014 | ||||
| Date of publication | 24 Apr 2015 15:51 | ||||
| Institutions | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Herz-, Thorax- und herznahe Gefäßchirurgie | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Keywords | ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; OFF-PUMP; ON-PUMP; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; FOLLOW-UP; REVASCULARIZATION; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Minimized extracorporeal circulation; Mortality; Outcome | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| URN of the UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-317501 | ||||
| Item ID | 31750 |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics