Current therapeutic strategies of heterotopic ossification – a survey amongst orthopaedic and trauma departments in Germany - University of Regensburg Publication Server

URN to cite this document:: urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-330473
DOI to cite this document:: 10.5283/epub.33047

Winkler, Sebastian ; Wagner, Ferdinand ; Weber, Markus ; Matussek, Jan ; Craiovan, Benjamin ; Heers, Guido ; Springorum, Hans-Robert ; Grifka, Joachim ; Renkawitz, Tobias

Preview

PDF
(370kB)

Date of publication of this fulltext: 11 Dec 2015 17:40

Alternative links to fulltext:DOI Publisher

Details

Preview

Indexed in

Export bibliographical data

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a complication after tissue trauma, fracture and surgery (i.e. total hip arthroplasty). Prophylaxis is the most effective therapy. If HO formations become symptomatic and limit patients' quality of life, revision surgery is indicated and is usually combined with a perioperative oral prophylaxis (NSAIDs) and/or irradiation. However, a long-term use of NSAIDs can induce gastro-intestinal or cardiac side-effects and possible bony non-unions during fracture healing. Subject of this study was to assess the current status of HO prophylaxis after injuries or fractures and to evaluate current indications and strategies for excision of symptomatic HO. Methods: Between 2013 and 2014, a questionnaire was sent to 119 orthopaedic and trauma surgery departments in Germany. Participation was voluntary and all acquired data was given anonymously. Results: The cumulative feedback rate was 71 %. Trauma and orthopaedic surgery departments in Germany recommend oral HO prophylaxis after acetabulum and femoral neck fractures, elbow dislocation, and fracture or dislocation of the radial head. Pain upon movement and an increasing loss of range of motion in the affected joint are considered to be clear indications for HO surgery. A partial removal of ROM-limiting HO formations was also considered important. The vast majority of all departments include perioperative oral HO prophylaxis and/or irradiation if surgical HO removal is planned. The choice and duration of NSAIDs is highly variable. Conclusion: HO is of clinical significance in current traumatology and orthopaedics. Certain fractures and injuries are prone to HO, and prophylactic measures should be taken. The respondents in this survey assessed current therapeutic strategies for HO formations similarly. These concepts are in line with the literature. However, the duration of perioperative oral HO prophylaxis varied greatly among the specialist centres. This is significant as a long-term use of NSAIDs fosters a potential risk for the patients' safety and could influence the clinical outcome. National and international guidelines need to be developed to further reduce HO rates and improve patients' safety in trauma and orthopaedic surgery.

Owner only: item control page

Download Statistics

Altmetric

Alternative Statistics (altmetrics)

More literature (via CORE)

Current therapeutic strategies of heterotopic ossification – a survey amongst orthopaedic and trauma departments in Germany

Details

Preview

Indexed in

Export bibliographical data

Abstract

Abstract

Download Statistics

Downloads

Alternative Statistics (altmetrics)

More literature (via CORE)

University Library