Direkt zum Inhalt

Benditz, Achim ; Greimel, Felix ; Auer, Patrick ; Zeman, Florian ; Göttermann, Antje ; Grifka, Joachim ; Meissner, Winfried ; von Kunow, Frederik

Can Consistent Benchmarking within a Standardized Pain Management Concept Decrease Postoperative Pain after Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Prospective Cohort Study including 367 Patients

Benditz, Achim , Greimel, Felix, Auer, Patrick, Zeman, Florian, Göttermann, Antje, Grifka, Joachim, Meissner, Winfried und von Kunow, Frederik (2016) Can Consistent Benchmarking within a Standardized Pain Management Concept Decrease Postoperative Pain after Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Prospective Cohort Study including 367 Patients. Journal of Pain Research 2016 (9), S. 1205-1213.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 18 Jan 2017 14:37
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.35065


Zusammenfassung

Background: The number of total hip replacement surgeries has steadily increased over recent years. Reduction in postoperative pain increases patient satisfaction and enables better mobilization. Thus, pain management needs to be continuously improved. Problems are often caused not only by medical issues but also by organization and hospital structure. The present study shows how the quality of ...

Background: The number of total hip replacement surgeries has steadily increased over recent years. Reduction in postoperative pain increases patient satisfaction and enables better mobilization. Thus, pain management needs to be continuously improved. Problems are often caused not only by medical issues but also by organization and hospital structure. The present study shows how the quality of pain management can be increased by implementing a standardized pain concept and simple, consistent, benchmarking. Methods: All patients included in the study had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). Outcome parameters were analyzed 24 hours after surgery by means of the questionnaires from the German-wide project "Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management" (QUIPS). A pain nurse interviewed patients and continuously assessed outcome quality parameters. A multidisciplinary team of anesthetists, orthopedic surgeons, and nurses implemented a regular procedure of data analysis and internal benchmarking. The health care team was informed of any results, and suggested improvements. Every staff member involved in pain management participated in educational lessons, and a special pain nurse was trained in each ward. Results: From 2014 to 2015, 367 patients were included. The mean maximal pain score 24 hours after surgery was 4.0 (+/- 3.0) on an 11-point numeric rating scale, and patient satisfaction was 9.0 (+/- 1.2). Over time, the maximum pain score decreased (mean 3.0, +/- 2.0), whereas patient satisfaction significantly increased (mean 9.8, +/- 0.4; p<0.05). Among 49 anonymized hospitals, our clinic stayed on first rank in terms of lowest maximum pain and patient satisfaction over the period. Conclusion: Results were already acceptable at the beginning of benchmarking a standardized pain management concept. But regular benchmarking, implementation of feedback mechanisms, and staff education made the pain management concept even more successful. Multidisciplinary teamwork and flexibility in adapting processes seem to be highly important for successful pain management.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftJournal of Pain Research
Verlag:DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
Ort der Veröffentlichung:ALBANY
Band:2016
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:9
Seitenbereich:S. 1205-1213
Datum19 Dezember 2016
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.2147/JPR.S124379DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsQUALITY IMPROVEMENT; POSTSURGICAL PAIN; PERCEPTIONS; ANALGESIA; KNOWLEDGE; THERAPY; postoperative pain; total hip arthroplasty; pain management concept; benchmarking
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-350657
Dokumenten-ID35065

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben