| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 1MB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Development of an algorithm using clinical tests to avoid post-operative residual neuromuscular block
Unterbuchner, Christoph
, Blobner, Manfred
, Pühringer, Friedrich, Janda, Matthias, Bischoff, Sebastian, Bein, Berthold, Schmidt, Annette, Ulm, Kurt, Pithamitsis, Viktor und Fink, Heidrun
(2017)
Development of an algorithm using clinical tests to avoid post-operative residual neuromuscular block.
BMC Anesthesiology 17 (1), S. 1-10.
Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 30 Jan 2018 07:56
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.36652
Zusammenfassung
Background: Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is the gold standard to detect postoperative residual curarization (PORC). Many anesthesiologists, however, use insensitive, qualitative neuromuscular monitoring or unreliable, clinical tests. Goal of this multicentre, prospective, double-blinded, assessor controlled study was to develop an algorithm of muscle function tests to identify PORC. ...
Background: Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is the gold standard to detect postoperative residual curarization (PORC). Many anesthesiologists, however, use insensitive, qualitative neuromuscular monitoring or unreliable, clinical tests. Goal of this multicentre, prospective, double-blinded, assessor controlled study was to develop an algorithm of muscle function tests to identify PORC. Methods: After extubation a blinded anesthetist performed eight clinical tests in 165 patients. Test results were correlated to calibrated electromyography train-of-four (TOF) ratio and to a postoperatively applied uncalibrated acceleromyography. A classification and regression tree (CART) was calculated developing the algorithm to identify PORC. This was validated against uncalibrated acceleromyography and tactile judgement of TOF fading in separate 100 patients. Results: After eliminating three tests with poor correlation, a model with four tests (r = 0.844) and uncalibrated acceleromyography (r = 0.873) were correlated to electromyographical TOF-values without losing quality of prediction. CART analysis showed that three consecutively performed tests (arm lift, head lift and swallowing or eye opening) can predict electromyographical TOF. Prediction coefficients reveal an advantage of the uncalibrated acceleromyography in terms of specificity to identify the EMG measured train-of-four ratio < 0.7 (100% vs. 42.9%) and < 0.9 (89.7% vs. 34.5%) compared to the algorithm. However, due to the high sensitivity of the algorithm (100% vs. 94.4%), the risk to overlook an awake patient with a train-of-four ratio < 0.7 was minimal. Tactile judgement of TOF fading showed poorest sensitivity and specifity at train of four ratio < 0.9 (33.7%, 0%) and <0.7 (18.8%, 16.7%). Conclusions: Residual neuromuscular blockade can be detected by uncalibrated acceleromyography and if not available by a pathway of four clinical muscle function tests in awake patients. The algorithm has a discriminative power comparable to uncalibrated AMG within TOF-values >0.7 and <0.3.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | BMC Anesthesiology | ||||
| Verlag: | BMC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ort der Veröffentlichung: | LONDON | ||||
| Band: | 17 | ||||
| Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels: | 1 | ||||
| Seitenbereich: | S. 1-10 | ||||
| Datum | 4 August 2017 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Anästhesiologie | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | PARTIALLY PARALYZED HUMANS; POSTANESTHESIA CARE-UNIT; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT; ANTIDEPOLARIZING BLOCK; ADDUCTOR POLLICIS; ACCELEROMYOGRAPHY; RECOVERY; SUGAMMADEX; REVERSAL; CURARIZATION; Postoperative residual curarization; electromyography; acceleromyography; algorithm; clinical muscle function tests | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-366529 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 36652 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik