Second cancer risk after radiation therapy of ependymoma using the flattening filter free irradiation mode of a linear accelerator

URN to cite this document:: urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-376282
DOI to cite this document:: 10.5283/epub.37628

Alvarez Moret, Judit ; Obermeier, Tina ; Pohl, Fabian ; Loeschel, Rainer ; Koelbl, Oliver ; Dobler, Barbara

License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
PDF
(657kB)

Date of publication of this fulltext: 24 Aug 2018 10:04

Alternative links to fulltext:DOI Publisher Publisher

Details

Preview

Indexed in

Export bibliographical data

Abstract

Abstract

Pediatric patients suffering from ependymoma are usually treated with cranial or craniospinal three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). Intensity-modulated techniques spare dose to the surrounding tissue, but the risk for second malignancies may be increased due to the increase in low-dose volume. The aim of this study is to investigate if the flattening filter free (FFF) mode allows reducing the risk for second malignancies compared to the mode with flattening filter (FF) for intensity-modulated techniques and to 3DCRT. A reduction of the risk would be advantageous for treating pediatric ependymoma. 3DCRT was compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with and without flattening filter. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were compared to evaluate the plan quality and used to calculate the excess absolute risk (EAR) to develop second cancer in the brain. Dose verification was performed with a two-dimensional (2D) ionization chamber array and the out-of-field dose was measured with an ionization chamber to determine the EAR in peripheral organs. Delivery times were measured. Both VMAT and IMRT achieved similar plan quality in terms of dose sparing in the OAR and higher PTV coverage as compared to 3DCRT. Peripheral dose in low-dose region, which is proportional to the EAR in organs located in this region, for example, gonads, bladder, or bowel, could be significantly reduced using FFF. The lowest peripheral EAR and lowest delivery times were hereby achieved with VMAT(FFF). The EAR calculated based on DVH in the brain could not be reduced using FFF mode. VMAT(FFF) improved the target coverage and homogeneity and kept the dose in the OAR similar compared to 3DCRT. In addition, delivery times were significantly reduced using VMAT(FFF). Therefore, for radiotherapy of ependymoma patients, VMAT(FFF) may be considered advantageous for the combination of Elekta Synergy linac and Oncentra External Beam planning system used in this study.

Owner only: item control page

Download Statistics

Altmetric

Alternative Statistics (altmetrics)

More literature (via CORE)

Details

Preview

Indexed in

Export bibliographical data

Abstract

Abstract

Download Statistics

Downloads

Alternative Statistics (altmetrics)

More literature (via CORE)

University Library