| Item type: | Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal or Publication Title: | Neurosurgical Focus | ||||
| Publisher: | AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS | ||||
| Place of Publication: | ROLLING MEADOWS | ||||
| Volume: | 42 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 5 | ||||
| Page Range: | E11 | ||||
| Date: | 2017 | ||||
| Institutions: | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Neurochirurgie | ||||
| Identification Number: |
| ||||
| Keywords: | LUMBAR SPINE; PERCUTANEOUS PLACEMENT; FREE HAND; IN-VIVO; ACCURACY; SURGERY; FLUOROSCOPY; INSERTION; robot-guided instrumentation; percutaneous; pedicle screw | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||
| Status: | Published | ||||
| Refereed: | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg: | Yes | ||||
| Item ID: | 39047 |
Web of ScienceAbstract
OBJECTIVE Recent studies have investigated the role of spinal image guidance for pedicle screw placement. Many authors have observed an elevated placement accuracy and overall improvement of outcome measures. This study assessed a bi-institutional experience following introduction of the Renaissance miniature robot for spinal image guidance in Europe. METHODS The medical records and radiographs ...
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent studies have investigated the role of spinal image guidance for pedicle screw placement. Many authors have observed an elevated placement accuracy and overall improvement of outcome measures. This study assessed a bi-institutional experience following introduction of the Renaissance miniature robot for spinal image guidance in Europe. METHODS The medical records and radiographs of all patients who underwent robot-guided implantation of spinal instrumentation using the novel system (between October 2011 and March 2015 in Mainz and February 2014 and February 2016 in Regensburg) were reviewed to determine the efficacy and safety of the newly introduced robotic system. Screw position accuracy, complications, exposure durations to intraoperative radiation, and reoperation rate were assessed. RESULTS Of the 413 surgeries that used robotic guidance, 406 were via a minimally invasive approach. In 7 cases the surgeon switched to conventional screw placement, using a midline approach, due to referencing problems. A total of 2067 screws were implanted using robotic guidance, and 1857 screws were evaluated by postoperative CT. Of the 1857 screws, 1799 (96.9%) were classified as having an acceptable or good position, whereas 38 screws (2%) showed deviations of 3-6 mm and 20 screws (1.1%) had deviations > 6 mm. Nine misplaced screws, implanted in 7 patients, required revision surgery, yielding a screw revision rate of 0.48% of the screws and 7 of 406 (1.7%) of the patients. The mean +/- SD per-patient intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure was 114.4 (+/- 72.5) seconds for 5.1 screws on average and any further procedure required. Perioperative and direct postoperative complications included hemorrhage (2 patients, 0.49%) and wound infections necessitating surgical revision (20 patients, 4.9%). CONCLUSIONS The hexapod miniature robotic device proved to be a safe and robust instrument in all situations, including those in which patients were treated on an emergency basis. Placement accuracy was high; peri-and early postoperative complication rates were found to be lower than rates published in other series of percutaneous screw placement techniques. Intraoperative radiation exposure was found to be comparable to published values for other minimally invasive and conventional approaches.
Metadata last modified: 25 Nov 2020 15:45
Altmetric