| Download ( PDF | 190kB) |
Visual contrast response functions in Parkinson's disease: evidence from electroretinograms, visually evoked potentials and psychophysics
Langheinrich, T., Tebartz van Elst, L., Lagrèze, W. A., Bach, M., Lücking, C. H. and Greenlee, Mark W.
(2000)
Visual contrast response functions in Parkinson's disease: evidence from electroretinograms, visually evoked potentials and psychophysics.
Clinical Neurophysiology 111 (1), pp. 66-74.
Date of publication of this fulltext: 16 Jan 2020 10:34
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.41257
Abstract
Objectives: Visual contrast detection thresholds and suprathreshold contrast discrimination thresholds were compared to luminance and flash/pattern electroretinograms (ERG) and visually evoked potentials (VEP) in patients with Parkinson's disease (n=31), patients with multiple system atrophy (n=6), patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (n=6) and control patients without central nervous ...
Objectives: Visual contrast detection thresholds and suprathreshold contrast discrimination thresholds were compared to luminance and flash/pattern electroretinograms (ERG) and visually evoked potentials (VEP) in patients with Parkinson's disease (n=31), patients with multiple system atrophy (n=6), patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (n=6) and control patients without central nervous disease (n=33).
Methods: The stimuli were luminance modulated full-field (flash) or horizontally oriented sinewave gratings (pattern), the latter having either a low (0.5 cycles/deg) or medium (4.0 cycles/deg) spatial frequency. Stimulus contrast ranged from 10 to 80% so that contrast response functions could be derived.
Results: Contrast thresholds were higher in the patients with Parkinson's disease than in the control patients. Contrast discrimination thresholds were also somewhat elevated in patients with Parkinson's disease. Pattern ERG amplitudes were significantly reduced in patients with Parkinson's disease for the medium spatial frequency stimulus, but less for the low spatial frequency and flash stimuli.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that Parkinson’s disease impairs contrast processing in the retina. VEP amplitudes did not significantly differ between the groups for the conditions tested. Patients with progressive supranuclear palsy also showed impaired contrast perception and reduced ERG amplitudes, whereas patients with multiple system atrophy were less impaired.
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | Clinical Neurophysiology | ||||
| Publisher: | Elsevier | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume: | 111 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 1 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 66-74 | ||||
| Date | 2000 | ||||
| Institutions | Human Sciences > Institut für Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Psychologie I (Allgemeine Psychologie I und Methodenlehre) - Prof. Dr. Mark W. Greenlee | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Keywords | Contrast discrimination, Electroretinogram, Visual evoked potentials, Parkinson's disease, Neurodegenerative diseases | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 500 Science > 570 Life sciences | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| URN of the UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-412575 | ||||
| Item ID | 41257 |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics