Direkt zum Inhalt

Hutmacher, Fabian ; Kuhbandner, Christof

Does the Attentional Boost Effect Depend on the Intentionality of Encoding? Investigating the Mechanisms Underlying Memory for Visual Objects Presented at Behaviorally Relevant Moments in Time

Hutmacher, Fabian und Kuhbandner, Christof (2020) Does the Attentional Boost Effect Depend on the Intentionality of Encoding? Investigating the Mechanisms Underlying Memory for Visual Objects Presented at Behaviorally Relevant Moments in Time. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (584187), S. 1-8.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 14 Jan 2021 11:18
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.44269


Zusammenfassung

Pictures in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream are better remembered when they are simultaneously presented with targets of an unrelated detection task than when they are presented with distractors. However, it is unclear whether this so-called "attentional boost effect" depends on the intentionality of encoding. While there are studies suggesting that the attentional boost effect ...

Pictures in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream are better remembered when they are simultaneously presented with targets of an unrelated detection task than when they are presented with distractors. However, it is unclear whether this so-called "attentional boost effect" depends on the intentionality of encoding. While there are studies suggesting that the attentional boost effect even occurs when encoding is incidental, there are several methodological issues with these studies, which may have undermined the incidental encoding instructions. The present study (N = 141) investigated the role of the intentionality of encoding with an improved experimental design. Specifically, to prevent a spill-over of intentional resources to the pictures in the RSVP stream, the speed of the stream was increased (to four pictures per second) and each picture was presented only once during the course of the experiment. An attentional boost effect was only found when encoding was intentional but not when encoding was incidental. Interestingly, memory performance for incidentally encoded pictures was nevertheless substantially above chance, independently of whether images were presented with search-relevant targets or distractors. These results suggest that the attentional boost effect is a memory advantage that occurs only under intentional encoding conditions, and that perceptual long-term memory representations are formed as a natural product of perception, independently of the presence of behaviorally relevant events.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftFrontiers in Psychology
Verlag:Frontiers
Ort der Veröffentlichung:LAUSANNE
Band:11
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:584187
Seitenbereich:S. 1-8
Datum9 November 2020
InstitutionenHumanwissenschaften > Institut für Psychologie
Humanwissenschaften > Institut für Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Psychologie VI (Pädagogische Psychologie) - Prof. Dr. Christof Kuhbandner
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584187DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsLONG-TERM-MEMORY; DIVIDED ATTENTION; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; IRRELEVANT; RECOGNITION; STIMULI; NEED; attentional boost effect; visual long-term memory; incidental encoding; intentional encoding; perceptual long-term memory
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-442698
Dokumenten-ID44269

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben