| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 993kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Diagnostic value of FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with surgically managed infective endocarditis – results of a retrospective analysis at a tertiary center
Sag, Sabine Julia Maria, Menhart, Karin, Grosse, Jirka, Hitzenbichler, Florian
, Hanses, Frank, Mohr, Arno, Salzberger, Bernd
, Zerdzitzki, Matthäus R., Hilker, Michael, Rupprecht, Leopold
, Hellwig, Dirk
, Schmid, Christof, Maier, Lars S. und Sag, Can Martin
(2020)
Diagnostic value of FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with surgically managed infective endocarditis – results of a retrospective analysis at a tertiary center.
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 08 Feb 2021 11:03
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.44799
Zusammenfassung
Background We assessed the diagnostic value of FDG PET/CT in a real-world cohort of patients with surgically managed infective endocarditis (IE). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients hospitalized in a tertiary IE referral medical center from January 2014 to October 2018 fulfilling the following criteria: ICD-10 code for IE and OPS code for both, heart surgery and FDG ...
Background We assessed the diagnostic value of FDG PET/CT in a real-world cohort of patients with surgically managed infective endocarditis (IE). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients hospitalized in a tertiary IE referral medical center from January 2014 to October 2018 fulfilling the following criteria: ICD-10 code for IE and OPS code for both, heart surgery and FDG PET/CT. Results Final analysis included 29 patients, whereof 28 patients had surgically proven IE. FDG PET/CT scan was true-positive in 15 patients (sensitivity (SEN) 56%) and false-negative in 12 patients. Combination of Duke criteria (DC) with FDG PET/CT scan resulted in gain of SEN for all patients with confirmed IE (SEN of DC 79% vs SEN of combination DC and FDG PET/CT 89%), driven by a relevant gain in PVE patients only (SEN of DC 78% vs SEN of combination DC and FDG PET/CT 94%). Interestingly, higher prosthesis age was observed in patients with false-negative scans. Conclusions We found a SEN of 56% for FDG PET/CT in a real-world cohort of patients with surgically proven IE which was associated with a 16% gain of IE diagnosis in patients with PVE when combined with DC.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | ||||
| Verlag: | Springer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ort der Veröffentlichung: | NEW YORK | ||||
| Datum | 2020 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Herz-, Thorax- und herznahe Gefäßchirurgie Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin II Medizin > Abteilung für Nuklearmedizin | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; Inflammation; PET; image interpretation | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-447996 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 44799 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik