Direkt zum Inhalt

Rupp, Markus ; Kerschbaum, Maximilian ; Klute, Lisa ; Frank, Leona ; Alt, Volker

Knochentransplantation oder Biomaterial? Eine Analyse von 99.863 Operationen in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aus dem Jahr 2018 in Deutschland

Rupp, Markus, Kerschbaum, Maximilian , Klute, Lisa, Frank, Leona und Alt, Volker (2021) Knochentransplantation oder Biomaterial? Eine Analyse von 99.863 Operationen in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aus dem Jahr 2018 in Deutschland. Unfallchirurg 124, S. 146-152.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 18 Mrz 2021 06:10
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.45196


Zusammenfassung

Background The aims of this study were (1) to analyze the total number of interventions with autologous or allogeneic bone transplantation as well as biomaterials, (2) to investigate the different types of biomaterials, autologous and allogeneic bone transplantations and (3) to analyze the additional use of an antibiotic additive in biomaterials. Methods Data were obtained from the Federal ...

Background The aims of this study were (1) to analyze the total number of interventions with autologous or allogeneic bone transplantation as well as biomaterials, (2) to investigate the different types of biomaterials, autologous and allogeneic bone transplantations and (3) to analyze the additional use of an antibiotic additive in biomaterials. Methods Data were obtained from the Federal Statistical Office for the year 2018. The surgery and procedure codes 5-784 "bone transplantation and transposition" and 5-785 "implantation of alloplastic bone substitutes" were used to analyze the procedure frequency of implantation of biomaterials, such as calcium phosphate ceramics, calcium sulphate, calcium phosphate cements and polymethyl methacrylate as well as autologous and allogeneic bone for defect reconstruction of the extremities and pelvis. Results In 2018 a total of 99,863 procedures were performed using autografts (54,784, 55%), biomaterials (23,838, 24%) and allografts (21,241, 21%). For both autografts and allografts cancellous bone grafting was used most frequently (77% and 79%, respectively). For biomaterials, ceramics (42%) were used more frequently than bone cements (37%, other biomaterials 21%). In 16,027 cases (67%) with biomaterials no antibiotic supplement was used. Antibiotic supplementation was mainly used for bone cements (6612 cases, 75%). Conclusion In 2018 bone transplants or biomaterials were used in a considerable number of the 99,863 bone defect reconstruction procedures. Autologous bone was used in more than half of the cases (55%), biomaterials in approximately one quarter (24%) and allogenic bone in approximately one fifth (21%). Ceramics (42%) were more often used as biomaterials than cements (37%). The addition of antibiotics was mainly used with cements (75%).



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftUnfallchirurg
Verlag:Springer
Ort der Veröffentlichung:NEW YORK
Band:124
Seitenbereich:S. 146-152
Datum2021
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Unfallchirurgie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1007/s00113-020-00861-zDOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsILIAC CREST; DEFECTS; MANAGEMENT; RIA; Bone graft substitute; Bone cement; Ceramic bone void fillers; Autograft; Allograft
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-451963
Dokumenten-ID45196

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben