Go to content
UR Home

Vergleich der DRG-Erlöse zwischen Fast- und Slow-Track-Verfahren beim zweizeitigen Prothesenwechsel bei periprothetischen Hüftinfektionen im aG-DRG-System 2020

Comparison of DRG revenues between fast and slow-track procedures for a two-stage replacement of prostheses for periprosthetic hip infections in the aG-DRG system 2020

URN to cite this document:
urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-455851
DOI to cite this document:
10.5283/epub.45585
Hierl, Katja ; Rupp, Markus ; Worlicek, Michael ; Baumann, Florian ; Pfeifer, Christian ; Alt, Volker
[img]
Preview
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
PDF - Published Version
(396kB)
Date of publication of this fulltext: 28 Apr 2021 05:08

This publication is part of the DEAL contract with Springer.


Abstract

Background The treatment of periprosthetic hip infections is usually cost intensive, so it is generally not cost effective for hospitals. In chronic infections, a two-stage procedure is often indicated, which can be done as a fast-track procedure with a short prosthetic-free interim interval (2-4 weeks) or as a slow-track procedure with a long prosthetic-free interim interval (over 4 weeks). Aim ...

plus


Owner only: item control page
  1. Homepage UR

University Library

Publication Server

Contact:

Publishing: oa@ur.de
0941 943 -4239 or -69394

Dissertations: dissertationen@ur.de
0941 943 -3904

Research data: datahub@ur.de
0941 943 -5707

Contact persons