Direkt zum Inhalt

Wolf, Franziska ; Spoerl, Steffen ; Gottsauner, Maximilian ; Klingelhöffer, Christoph ; Spanier, Gerrit ; Kolbeck, Carola ; Reichert, Torsten E. ; Hautmann, Matthias G. ; Ettl, Tobias

Significance of site‐specific radiation dose and technique for success of implant‐based prosthetic rehabilitation in irradiated head and neck cancer patients—A cohort study

Wolf, Franziska, Spoerl, Steffen, Gottsauner, Maximilian, Klingelhöffer, Christoph, Spanier, Gerrit, Kolbeck, Carola, Reichert, Torsten E., Hautmann, Matthias G. und Ettl, Tobias (2021) Significance of site‐specific radiation dose and technique for success of implant‐based prosthetic rehabilitation in irradiated head and neck cancer patients—A cohort study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 23, S. 444-455.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 07 Mai 2021 04:28
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.45649


Zusammenfassung

Background Radiotherapy aggravates implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer. Purpose To evaluate the impact of radiation dose at implant and parotid gland site for prosthetic rehabilitation. Material and methods The retrospective study includes 121 irradiated head and neck cancer patients with 751 inserted implants. Radiation doses on implant bed and parotid ...

Background Radiotherapy aggravates implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer. Purpose To evaluate the impact of radiation dose at implant and parotid gland site for prosthetic rehabilitation. Material and methods The retrospective study includes 121 irradiated head and neck cancer patients with 751 inserted implants. Radiation doses on implant bed and parotid gland site were recorded by 3-dimensional modulated radiation plans. Implant success was clinically and radiographically evaluated according to modified Albrektsson criteria and compared to treatment- and patient-specific data. Results Implant overall survival after 5 years was 92.4% with an implant success rate of 74.9%. Main reasons for implant failure were marginal bone resorption (20.9%), implant not in situ or unloaded (9.6%) and peri-implantitis (7.5%). A mean radiation dose of 62.6 Gy was applied with a mean parotid dose of 35 Gy. Modulating radiation techniques went along with lower grades of xerostomia (p < 0.001). At implant site mean doses of 57.5, 42.0, and 32.3 Gy were recorded for oral, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal/laryngeal carcinoma, respectively. Implant success inversely correlated to radiation dose at implant site. Strong predictors for implant failure in uni- and multivariate analysis were implant-specific dose >50 Gy (HR 7.9), parotid dose >30 Gy (HR 2.3), bone (HR 14.5) and soft tissue (HR 4.5) transplants, bad oral hygiene (HR 3.8), nonmodulated radiation treatment planning (HR 14.5), and nontelescopic prosthetics (HR 5.2). Conclusion Radiotherapy impedes implant success in a dose-dependent manner at implant site. Modern radiation techniques effectively reduce xerostomia favoring implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation. Implantation in bone grafts is more critical and telescopic-retained overdentures should be preferred.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Verlag:Wiley
Ort der Veröffentlichung:HOBOKEN
Band:23
Seitenbereich:S. 444-455
Datum4 Mai 2021
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Strahlentherapie
Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Zahnärztliche Prothetik
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1111/cid.13005DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsDENTAL IMPLANTS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; BONE; RECONSTRUCTION; RESECTION; SURGERY; dose; head and neck cancer; implant&#8208; specific; modulated; radiotherapy; success
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-456499
Dokumenten-ID45649

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben