| Item type: | Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal or Publication Title: | RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren | ||||
| Publisher: | GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG | ||||
| Place of Publication: | STUTTGART | ||||
| Volume: | 190 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 05 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 427-432 | ||||
| Date: | 2018 | ||||
| Institutions: | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Röntgendiagnostik | ||||
| Identification Number: |
| ||||
| Keywords: | TUMOR BOARD; NEURORADIOLOGY; CONSULTATIONS; IMPACT; reimbursement; medicolegal Issues; second opinion | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||
| Status: | Published | ||||
| Refereed: | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg: | Yes | ||||
| Item ID: | 47214 |
Abstract
Background Interdisciplinary radiological conferences and boards can improve therapeutic pathways. Because of the reinterpretation and presentation of external image data, which already was read, an additional workload is created which is currently not considered by health care providers. In this review we discuss the ongoing basics and possibilities in health economy for a radiological second ...
Abstract
Background Interdisciplinary radiological conferences and boards can improve therapeutic pathways. Because of the reinterpretation and presentation of external image data, which already was read, an additional workload is created which is currently not considered by health care providers. In this review we discuss the ongoing basics and possibilities in health economy for a radiological second opinion for the outpatient and inpatient sector in Germany. Method Based on up-to-date literature and jurisdiction, we discuss the most important questions for the reimbursement for second opinions and conference presentations of external image data in an FAQ format. Additionally, we focus on the recently introduced E-Health law accordingly. Results Radiological services considering second opinion or board presentation of externally acquired image data are currently not adequately covered by health care providers. In particular, there is no reimbursement possibility for the inpatient sector. Only patients with private insurance or privately paid second opinions can be charged when these patients visit the radiologist directly. Conclusion Currently there is no adequate reimbursement possibility for a radiological second opinion or image demonstrations in clinical conferences. It will be essential to integrate adequate reimbursement by health care providers in the near future because of the importance of radiology as an essential diagnostic and therapeutic medical partner. Key Points: Currently there is no reimbursement for image interpretation and presentation in boards. Second opinions can only be reimbursed for patients with private insurance or privately recompensed. The E-Health law allows reimbursement for tele-counsel in very complex situations. It will be crucial to integrate radiological second opinion in future reimbursement policies by health care providers. Citation Format Schreyer AG, Steinhauser RT, Rosenberg B. Externally Acquired Radiological Data for the Clinical Routine A Review of the Reimbursement Situation in Germany. Fortschr Rontgenstr 2018; 190: 427-432
Metadata last modified: 28 Jul 2021 17:18
Altmetric