| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 538kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung-NichtKommerziell-KeineBearbeitung 4.0 International |
Significant Improvement in Shoulder Function and Pain in Patients Following Biologic Augmentation of Revision Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using an Autologous Fibrin Scaffold and Bone Marrow Aspirate Derived From the Proximal Humerus
Voss, Andreas, McCarthy, Mary Beth, Bellas, Nicholas, Kellner, Ralf, Beitzel, Knut, Dyrna, Felix, Imhoff, Andreas B., Mazzocca, Augustus D., Muench, Lukas N. und Berthold, Daniel P. (2021) Significant Improvement in Shoulder Function and Pain in Patients Following Biologic Augmentation of Revision Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using an Autologous Fibrin Scaffold and Bone Marrow Aspirate Derived From the Proximal Humerus. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation 3 (6), e1819-e1825.Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 31 Jan 2022 15:30
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.51551
Zusammenfassung
Purpose To clinically evaluate patients who underwent a biologic augmentation technique in revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using an autologous fibrin scaffold and concentrated stem cells isolated from bone marrow aspirate (BMA) obtained from the proximal humerus. Methods This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent biologic augmentation ...
Purpose
To clinically evaluate patients who underwent a biologic augmentation technique in revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using an autologous fibrin scaffold and concentrated stem cells isolated from bone marrow aspirate (BMA) obtained from the proximal humerus.
Methods
This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent biologic augmentation of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using an autologous fibrin scaffold and BMA obtained from the proximal humerus between 2014 and 2015. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. Outcome measures were collected preoperatively and postoperatively including range of motion as well as American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Form, Simple Shoulder Test, single assessment numeric evaluation, and visual analog score. In addition, BMA samples of each patient were assessed for the number of nucleated cells and colony-forming units. Regression analysis was performed to investigate whether the number of nucleated cells and colony-forming units had an influence on outcome and failure.
Results
Ten patients who underwent biologic augmentation of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using an autologous fibrin scaffold and concentrated BMA obtained from the proximal humerus between 2014 and 2015 were included. The mean follow-up time was 30.7 (range: 12-49) months. Four patients were revised at final follow-up. Postoperative clinical scores improved significantly: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (28.1 ± 5.4 to 60.9 ± 9.0; P < .01), single assessment numeric evaluation (6.6 ± 2.3 to 65.1 ± 10.9; P < .01), visual analog scale (7.2 ± 0.9 to 3.1 ± 0.9; P < .01), and Simple Shoulder Test (1.6 ± 0.5 to 10.3 ± 5.7; P < .01). Postoperative range of motion increased significantly with regard to flexion (97.0 ± 13.6 to 151.0 ± 12.2; P < .01) and abduction (88.0 ± 14.0 to 134.0 ± 15.1; P = .038) but not with external rotation (38.0 ± 5.7 to 50.5 ± 6.5; P = .16). Less pain was correlated to an increased number of nucleated cells (P = .026); however, there was no correlation between failure rate and number of nucleated cells (P = .430).
Conclusions
Patients who underwent biologic augmentation of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using an autologous fibrin scaffold and concentrated BMA demonstrated a significant improvement in shoulder function along with reduction of pain. However, the overall revision rate for this procedure was 40%.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation | ||||
| Verlag: | Elsevier | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Band: | 3 | ||||
| Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels: | 6 | ||||
| Seitenbereich: | e1819-e1825 | ||||
| Datum | 15 Dezember 2021 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Unfallchirurgie | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-515518 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 51551 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik