Direkt zum Inhalt

Rupp, Markus ; Walter, Nike ; Lau, Edmund ; Worlicek, Michael ; Kurtz, Steven M. ; Alt, Volker

Recent trends in revision knee arthroplasty in Germany

Rupp, Markus , Walter, Nike , Lau, Edmund , Worlicek, Michael, Kurtz, Steven M. und Alt, Volker (2021) Recent trends in revision knee arthroplasty in Germany. Scientific Reports 11 (1), S. 15479.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 15 Feb 2022 19:41
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.51652


Zusammenfassung

We aimed to answer the following questions: (1) How did numbers of revision knee arthroplasty procedures develop in Germany over the last decade compared to primary TKA? (2) How high was the percentage of septic interventions in knee prosthesis revisions? (3) Which treatment strategy was chosen for surgical treatment of knee PJI? Revision arthroplasty rates as a function of age, gender, infection ...

We aimed to answer the following questions: (1) How did numbers of revision knee arthroplasty procedures develop in Germany over the last decade compared to primary TKA? (2) How high was the percentage of septic interventions in knee prosthesis revisions? (3) Which treatment strategy was chosen for surgical treatment of knee PJI? Revision arthroplasty rates as a function of age, gender, infection and type of prosthesis were quantified based on Operation and Procedure Classification System codes using revision knee arthroplasty data from 2008 to 2018, provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis). In 2018, a total number 23,812 revision knee arthroplasties were performed in Germany, yielding an overall increase of 20.76% between 2008 and 2018. In comparison, primary TKA procedures increased by 23.8% from 152,551 performed procedures in 2008 to 188,866 procedures in 2018. Hence, 12.6% of knee arthroplasties required a revision in 2018. Septic interventions increased by 51.7% for all revisions. A trend towards higher numbers in younger patients was observed. Compared to 2008, 17.41% less DAIR procedures were performed, whereby single-stage and two- or multi-stage change increased by 38.76% and 42.76% in 2018, respectively. The increasing number of revision knee arthroplasty in Germany, especially in younger patients and due to infection, underlines the need for future efforts to improve treatment strategies to delay primary arthroplasty and avoid periprosthetic joint infection.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftScientific Reports
Verlag:Nature
Ort der Veröffentlichung:BERLIN
Band:11
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:1
Seitenbereich:S. 15479
Datum29 Juli 2021
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Unfallchirurgie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1038/s41598-021-94988-7DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsPERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; UNITED-STATES; PROJECTIONS; HIP; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FAILURE;
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-516521
Dokumenten-ID51652

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben