A critical analysis of clinical research methods to study regenerative endodontics

URN to cite this document:: urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-521905
DOI to cite this document:: 10.5283/epub.52190

Galler, Kerstin M. ; Akamp, Tobias ; Knüttel, Helge

; Widbiller, Matthias

There is a more recent version of this item available.

License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Plain Text - Supplemental Material
Appendix 1: Search history
(3kB)

Preview

License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
PDF - Published Version
Article: Online Version of Record before inclusion in an issue
(2MB)

Date of publication of this fulltext: 28 Apr 2022 10:25

Alternative links to fulltext:Pubmed DOI Publisher

Details

Available versions of this item

Preview: Article: Online Version of Record before...

Export bibliographical data

Abstract

Regenerative endodontic treatment such as revitalization provides a treatment option for immature teeth with pulp necrosis. The main difference to the alternative procedure, the apical plug, is the induction of a blood clot inside the canal as a scaffold for healing and new tissue formation. Due to the biology-based and minimally-invasive nature of the treatment, revitalization has raised ...