| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 527kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Does cavity margin shaving reduce residual tumor and re‐excision rates? A systematic review
Fernandez‐Pacheco, Miriam
, Ortmann, Olaf, Ignatov, Atanas und Inwald, Elisabeth C.
(2022)
Does cavity margin shaving reduce residual tumor and re‐excision rates? A systematic review.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 25 Mai 2022 04:44
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.52315
Zusammenfassung
Purpose Cavity shaving (CS) is a surgical technique used in the treatment of breast cancer (BC). It may reduce margin positivity in histologic assessment and consequently reduces re- excision rates in breast conserving surgery (BCS). The evidence for this assumption is described in the present review. Methods A systematic review of relevant literature in English from January 1999 to April 2019 ...
Purpose Cavity shaving (CS) is a surgical technique used in the treatment of breast cancer (BC). It may reduce margin positivity in histologic assessment and consequently reduces re- excision rates in breast conserving surgery (BCS). The evidence for this assumption is described in the present review. Methods A systematic review of relevant literature in English from January 1999 to April 2019 was conducted. The analysis included studies on CS and its effects on re-excision rates and margin positivity. We searched PubMed databases for relevant publications. In total, 22 studies were included in the present review. Results The benefit from CS on re-excision rates and histologic margin positivity was variable. Out of 22 studies, 17 reported a reduction in both re-excision rates and histologic margin positivity in margin shaved patients. Four studies could not find a significant reduction of second surgeries and residual tumor rates. One study suggested that CS after BCS was superior to single BCS only in subgroup analysis in IDC tumors. Conclusion CS is a surgical technique that was shown to reduce re-excision and margin positivity rates in most of the studies. Furthermore, it can be a useful tool to assess specimen margins and detect multifocality.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | ||||
| Verlag: | SPRINGER HEIDELBERG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ort der Veröffentlichung: | HEIDELBERG | ||||
| Datum | 20 Mai 2022 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe (Schwerpunkt Frauenheilkunde) | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY; CONSERVATION SURGERY; CANCER; TIME; REEXCISION; CARCINOMA; NEED; Cavity shaving; Margin shaving; Cavity margin shaving; Lumpectomy; Breast-conserving surgery; therapy; Breast cancer | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-523152 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 52315 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik