| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 1MB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets
Jungbauer, Rebecca, Proff, Peter, Edelhoff, Daniel und Stawarczyk, Bogna
(2022)
Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets.
Scientific Reports 12 (1).
Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 31 Mai 2022 05:46
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.52339
Zusammenfassung
To investigate the influence of different pretreatment methods, attachment materials and artificial aging on shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia and metal brackets. Zirconia substrates were pretreated with silica coated alumina (CoJet) and (1) clearfill ceramic primer plus (CF), (2) RelyX ceramic primer (RXP), (3) Futurabond U (FU). The brackets were bonded with (1) Transbond XT ...
To investigate the influence of different pretreatment methods, attachment materials and artificial aging on shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia and metal brackets. Zirconia substrates were pretreated with silica coated alumina (CoJet) and (1) clearfill ceramic primer plus (CF), (2) RelyX ceramic primer (RXP), (3) Futurabond U (FU). The brackets were bonded with (1) Transbond XT Adhesive (TB), (2) BrackFix Adhesive (BF), (3) bracepaste adhesive (BP). SBS was tested after 24 h, 500 thermal cycles, 90 d at 37 degrees C with a universal testing machine. SBS values reached from 8.3 to 16.9 MPa. The Weibull moduli ranged between 0.37 (RXP combined with BP after 90 d) and 7.42 (CF combined with TB after 24 h). The pretreatment with FU after 90 d, independent of the attachment material, and RXP with BF resulted in the lowest SBS values 8.3-9.9 MPa, the combination of RXP or CF with TB showed the highest (13.2-16.9 MPa) independent of aging. After FU pretreatment the proportion of ARI 1 and 0 was higher, of ARI 3 lower as after CF and RXP pretreatment. All tested combinations showed sufficiently high SBS values for clinical use. Pretreatment with FU presented the lowest values after 90 days.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Scientific Reports | ||||
| Verlag: | Nature | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ort der Veröffentlichung: | BERLIN | ||||
| Band: | 12 | ||||
| Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels: | 1 | ||||
| Datum | 20 Mai 2022 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Kieferorthopädie | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; LONG; | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Zum Teil | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-523391 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 52339 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik