Prevalence and outcomes of patients developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

URN to cite this document:: urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-529004
DOI to cite this document:: 10.5283/epub.52900

Oury, Cécile

; Lubnow, Matthias ; Berger, Johannes ; Schneckenpointner, Roland ; Zeman, Florian ; Lunz, Dirk ; Philipp, Alois ; Foltan, Maik ; Lehle, Karla ; Heimerl, Susanne ; Hart, Christina ; Schmid, Christof ; Fisser, Christoph ; Müller, Thomas

License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
PDF - Published Version
(871kB)

Date of publication of this fulltext: 26 Sep 2022 05:32

Alternative links to fulltext:DOI Publisher

Details

Preview

Indexed in

Export bibliographical data

Abstract

Abstract

Objectives Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the commonly used anticoagulant to prevent clotting of the ECMO circuit and thrombosis of the cannulated vessels. A side effect of UFH is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Little is known about HIT during ECMO and the impact of changing anticoagulation in ECMO patients with newly diagnosed HIT. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence, complications, impact of switching anticoagulation to argatroban and outcomes of patients developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) during either veno-venous (VV) or veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. Methods Retrospective observational single centre study of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients receiving VV ECMO therapy for severe respiratory failure and VA ECMO for circulatory failure from January 2006 to December 2016 of the Medical intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital of Regensburg. Treatment of HIT on ECMO was done with argatroban. Results 507 patients requiring ECMO were included. Further HIT-diagnostic was conducted if HIT-4T-score was >= 4. The HIT-confirmed group had positive HIT-enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay (ELISA) and positive heparin-induced-platelet-activation (HIPA) test, the HIT-suspicion group a positive HIT-ELISA and missing HIPA but remained on alternative anticoagulation until discharge and the HIT-excluded group a negative or positive HIT-ELISA, however negative HIPA. These were compared to group ECMO-control without any HIT suspicion. The prevalence of HIT-confirmed was 3.2%, of HIT-suspicion 2.0% and HIT-excluded 10.8%. Confirmed HIT was trendwise more frequent in VV than in VA (3.9 vs. 1.7% p = 0.173). Compared to the ECMO control group, patients with confirmed HIT were longer on ECMO (median 13 vs. 8 days, p = 0.002). Different types of complications were higher in the HIT-confirmed than in the ECMO-control group, but in-hospital mortality was not different (31% vs. 41%, p = 0.804). Conclusion HIT is rare on ECMO, should be suspected, if platelets are decreasing, but seems not to increase mortality if treated promptly.

Owner only: item control page

Download Statistics

Article Level Metrics (PLOS)

Altmetric

Alternative Statistics (altmetrics)

More literature (via CORE)

Details

Preview

Indexed in

Export bibliographical data

Abstract

Abstract

Download Statistics

Downloads

Article Level Metrics (PLOS)

Alternative Statistics (altmetrics)

More literature (via CORE)

University Library