License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 PDF - Published Version (726kB) |
- URN to cite this document:
- urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-538716
- DOI to cite this document:
- 10.5283/epub.53871
This publication is part of the DEAL contract with Springer.
Abstract
Purpose To compare the long-term outcome quality (≥ 15 years) of Class II:1 treatment using either a bionator (BIO) or a Herbst–multibracket appliance (HMB). Methods Patients who underwent functional treatment during the ideal treatment period for the respective approach (prepuberty vs. peak/postpeak) were assessed. Inclusion criteria were overjet ≥ 4 mm, skeletal Class II and availability of ...
Owner only: item control page