Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) can either be a consequence or an underlying mechanism of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Patients included in the CASTLE-AF (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF) trial who suffered from AF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction benefited from an AF burden <50% after catheter ablation compared ...
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) can either be a consequence or an underlying mechanism of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Patients included in the CASTLE-AF (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF) trial who suffered from AF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction benefited from an AF burden <50% after catheter ablation compared with those patients with an AF burden >50%.OBJECTIVES This analysis tried to explain the clinical findings of the CASTLE-AF trial regarding AF burden in a "back-to-bench" approach. METHODS To study the ventricular effects of different AF burdens, experiments were performed using human ventricular induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes undergoing in vitro AF simulation. Epifluorescence microscopy, action potential measurements, and measurements of sarcomere regularity were conducted.RESULTS Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes stimulated with AF burden of 60% or higher displayed typical hallmarks of heart failure. Ca2 thorn transient amplitude was significantly reduced indicating negative inotropic effects. Action potential duration was significantly prolonged, which represents a potential trigger for arrhythmias. A significant decrease of sarcomere regularity could explain impaired cardiac contractility in patients with high AF burden. These effects were more pronounced after 7 days of AF simulation compared with 48 hours.CONCLUSIONS Significant functional and structural alterations occurred at the cellular level at a threshold of w50% AF burden as it was observed to be harmful in the CASTLE-AF trial. Therefore, these translational results may help to understand the findings of the CASTLE-AF trial. (J Am Coll Cardiol EP 2022;8:1357-1366) (c) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Altmetric