Direkt zum Inhalt

Barth, Teresa ; Radeck, Viola ; Gamulescu, Maria-Andreea ; Helbig, Horst ; Märker, David

Management of macula-on giant retinal tear detachments– outcome of pars-plana-vitrectomy with silicone oil versus gas tamponade

Barth, Teresa , Radeck, Viola , Gamulescu, Maria-Andreea, Helbig, Horst und Märker, David (2024) Management of macula-on giant retinal tear detachments– outcome of pars-plana-vitrectomy with silicone oil versus gas tamponade. BMC Ophthalmology 24 (1).

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 27 Mai 2024 13:34
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.58337


Zusammenfassung

Background To compare the outcome of eyes with a macula-on giant retinal tear (GRT) detachment treated with pars-plana-vitrectomy (PPV) depending on the used endotamponade. Methods All consecutive cases with a macula-on GRT-associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) managed with PPV between 2007 and 2022 were retrospectively assessed depending on the selected endotamponade. By ...

Background To compare the outcome of eyes with a macula-on giant retinal tear (GRT) detachment treated with
pars-plana-vitrectomy (PPV) depending on the used endotamponade.
Methods All consecutive cases with a macula-on GRT-associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
(RRD) managed with PPV between 2007 and 2022 were retrospectively assessed depending on the selected
endotamponade. By reviewing medical charts and surgical protocols the pre- and intraoperative parameters were
analysed in detail. The number of vitreoretinal (VR) procedures needed for reattachment, the redetachment rate and
the functional outcome were evaluated. Eyes treated with primary silicone oil (SO) tamponade were compared to
eyes with primary gas tamponade. Cases with pre-existing conditions affecting outcome e.g. macula-off situation,
history of trauma, status after complicated cataract surgery, former VR surgery or proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade
C or higher were excluded.
Results Overall, 51 eyes of 45 patients with a macula-on GRT detachment were treated with PPV and SO (n = 32;
63%) or gas (n = 19; 37%) endotamponade in the observed period. Eyes with primary SO tamponade underwent on
average 2.3 (SD 0.8) VR procedures and had a redetachment rate of 13% (n = 4). Eyes with gas tamponade showed
a higher redetachment rate of 32% (n = 6) with a mean number of 1.6 (SD 1.0) PPV procedures. Postoperative bestcorrected
visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly better in eyes with primary gas tamponade (mean logMAR BCVA 0.32;
SD 0.30) compared to eyes with SO (mean logMAR BCVA 0.60; SD 0.42; p = 0.008).
Conclusions Surgical management of GRT-associated RRDs is complex. In clinical routine often SO is used as
endotamponade. Because of known disadvantages (second procedure necessary for SO removal, unexplained
SO-related visual loss, secondary glaucoma, SO emulsification) some VR surgeons prefer a gas tamponade. In
our cohort, eyes with a gas compared to SO tamponade showed higher redetachment rates. However, the final
postoperative BCVA was significantly better in eyes with gas compared to SO tamponade.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftBMC Ophthalmology
Verlag:Springer
Band:24
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:1
Datum22 April 2024
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Augenheilkunde
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1186/s12886-024-03437-2DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsGiant retinal tear, Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, Pars-plana-vitrectomy, Endotamponade, Silicone oil, Gas tamponade
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-583376
Dokumenten-ID58337

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben