Direkt zum Inhalt

Owner only: item control page
Papathemelis, Thomas ; Ortmann, Olaf ; Kohl, Cynthia ; Neuser, Petra ; Tol, Kees Kleihues-van ; Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika ; Ugocsai, Peter ; Walter, Christina Barbara ; Rottmann, Miriam ; Real, Catherine ; Justenhoven, Christina ; Robers, Gabriele ; Schneider, Constanze ; Gerken, Michael ; Sackmann, Andrea ; Kim-Wanner, Soo-Zin

Treatment of endometrial cancer from 2000 to 2020 in Germany: a retrospective population based cohort study

Papathemelis, Thomas, Ortmann, Olaf , Kohl, Cynthia, Neuser, Petra, Tol, Kees Kleihues-van, Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika, Ugocsai, Peter, Walter, Christina Barbara, Rottmann, Miriam, Real, Catherine, Justenhoven, Christina, Robers, Gabriele, Schneider, Constanze, Gerken, Michael, Sackmann, Andrea and Kim-Wanner, Soo-Zin (2024) Treatment of endometrial cancer from 2000 to 2020 in Germany: a retrospective population based cohort study. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 150 (5).

Date of publication of this fulltext: 28 May 2024 11:23
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.58341


Abstract

Purpose Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common malignancies among women in western countries. This study aimed to assess data on patient treatment in Germany throughout two decades to evaluate the development and effect of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Methods This retrospective registry study included 34,349 EC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. Patients were ...

Purpose
Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common malignancies among women in western countries. This study aimed to assess data on patient treatment in Germany throughout two decades to evaluate the development and effect of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.
Methods
This retrospective registry study included 34,349 EC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. Patients were classified into five risk groups. Overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method as well as univariable and multivariable Cox regression to evaluate risk factors and treatment options.
Results
Over the study period, minimal invasive surgery was used more often compared to open surgery and was associated with better overall survival. Patients with advanced EC were more likely to receive multimodal therapy.
Patients with intermediate risk EC had a good prognosis upon surgery, which further improved when radiotherapy was added. High-risk patients showed poorer prognosis but clearly benefited from additional radiotherapy. Survival of elderly high-risk patients with a non-endometrioid histology was improved when chemotherapy was added to surgery and radiotherapy.
Conclusion
Our study includes a large analysis of data from German clinical cancer registries on the care of endometrial cancer during two decades. We observed an increase of minimal invasive surgery. There is evidence that minimal invasive surgery is not inferior to open surgery. Adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy further improves survival depending on risk group and age.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleJournal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Publisher:Springer
Open Access Type:DEAL (Springer Gold)
Volume:150
Number of Issue or Book Chapter:5
Date27 May 2024
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe (Schwerpunkt Frauenheilkunde)
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1007/s00432-024-05772-9DOI
KeywordsOverall survival · Outcome · Multimodal therapy · Surgery · Radiotherapy · Chemotherapy · Retrospective cohort study
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgPartially
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-583410
Item ID58341

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben