Direkt zum Inhalt

Rosentritt, Martin ; Schmutzler, Anne ; Hahnel, Sebastian ; Kurzendorfer-Brose, Laura

The Influence of CLSM Magnification on the Measured Roughness of Differently Prepared Dental Materials

Rosentritt, Martin , Schmutzler, Anne, Hahnel, Sebastian und Kurzendorfer-Brose, Laura (2024) The Influence of CLSM Magnification on the Measured Roughness of Differently Prepared Dental Materials. Materials 17 (23), S. 5954.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 12 Dez 2024 13:51
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.59796


Zusammenfassung

This in vitro study investigated how varying magnifications (5×, 10×, 20×, and 50×) using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) influence the measured surface roughness parameters, Ra/Sa and Rz/Sz, of various materials with two surface treatments. Cylindrical specimens (d ≈ 8 mm, h ≈ 3 mm, n = 10) from titanium, zirconia, glass-ceramic, denture base material, and composite underwent diamond ...

This in vitro study investigated how varying magnifications (5×, 10×, 20×, and 50×) using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) influence the measured surface roughness parameters, Ra/Sa and Rz/Sz, of various materials with two surface treatments. Cylindrical specimens (d ≈ 8 mm, h ≈ 3 mm, n = 10) from titanium, zirconia, glass-ceramic, denture base material, and composite underwent diamond treatment (80 μm; wet) and polishing (#4000; wet; Tegramin-25, Struers, G). The surface roughness parameters (Ra/Sa, Rz/Sz) were measured with a CLSM (VK-100, Keyence, J) at 5×, 10×, 20×, and 50× magnifications. Line roughness (Ra/Rz) was measured along a 1000 μm distance in three parallel lines, while area roughness (Sa/Sz) was evaluated over a 2500 μm × 1900 μm area. The statistical analysis included ANOVA, the Bonferroni post hoc test, and Pearson correlation (SPSS 29, IBM, USA; α = 0.05). Ra/Sa and Rz/Sz showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.001, ANOVA) across magnifications, with values decreasing as magnification increased, highest at 5× and lowest at 50×. Titanium, zirconia, and glass-ceramic showed significant measured roughness values from 5× to 50×. Denture base material and composite had lower measured roughness values, especially after polishing. Line and area roughness varied significantly, indicating that magnification affects measured values. Standardizing magnifications is essential to ensure comparability between studies. A 50× magnification captures more detailed profile information while masking larger defects.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftMaterials
Verlag:MDPI
Band:17
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:23
Seitenbereich:S. 5954
Datum5 Dezember 2024
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Zahnärztliche Prothetik
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.3390/ma17235954DOI
Stichwörter / Keywordssurface roughness; Ra/Sa; Rz/Sz; confocal laser scanning microscopy; CLSM; magnification; dental materials
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-597967
Dokumenten-ID59796

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben